It's going to be the same temperature V+dV as before but the volume is V plus dV now.

将升温到跟路径1的结果一样,但是现在的体积是。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

The mind reflects the workings of the brain just like computation reflects the working of a computer.

心理反映了大脑的活动,就像运算结果反映了计算机的运行一样

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So then, just like we saw, analogous to what saw just before, dS/dp it's T dS/dp at constant T.

就像我们看到的,就像我们刚才看到的一样，结果是T乘以恒定温度下的。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

One way or the other it doesn't-- it all comes out to the same thing.

不管是哪种方式,最终结果都是一样的

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

We have the same basic structure, the same outcomes, but we imagine people cared about different things and we end up with a very different answer.

博弈的结构,结果都一样,但是人们在乎的东西不同了,所以我们得到了完全不同的答案

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

+ 4 and 4 + 3 are the same.

+ 4 和 4 + 3 结果一样

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

And then I'm going to do a similar thing to print things out. But would the solver do?

然后我还是一样要把结果输出来,那solver做的是什么呢？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

And this is a little different from what happened ten or so years ago, but the so-called Y2K problem was essentially the result of programmers not really having the foresight to realize, "Maybe we shouldn't use so few bits or so few digits to represent a year because eventually this will be a problem."

这个跟10年前发生的事情有点不一样,那个所谓的“Y2K“问题,本质上的结果是,程序员没有真实地预见和认识到，“可能我们没必要用到这些位数或数字,来表示一年，但是最终这个将会,是个问题“

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

How can I see they're the same thing?

为什么说两种算法结果一样呢

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Same qualitative result as before.

定性结果与之前一样。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

The thing is still not dominated and we could still have done exactly the same analysis, and actually you can see I'm not very far off in the numbers I made up, but things are not perfectly symmetric.

这虽然不能成为劣势策略,但我们还是能得出一样的分析结果,实际上这和我编的数字相差也不是很远,凡事并不总是绝对对称的嘛

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选