Why can't he write love poetry, secular poetry, instead of this much more disciplined, much more difficult mode of sacred and prophetic poetry ? that he seems already to have wedded himself to?
为什么不写爱情诗,世俗的诗,而是这些,拘束难写的庄严的充满套路的,他似乎长久以来一直都在写的诗呢?
I mean, I see that the love is there, how could it not be?
我是说,我就看到了真实的爱情,我怎么还能不信呢?
You don't think of Frost as a love poet.
你们肯定不认为他是爱情诗人。
And I mentioned three reasons, Why we need it as an independent field as opposed to just being " "well,let's do some studies on happiness,on relationships" ? as it is always being done?
我提到了三个原因,为何我们把它作为独立的研究,而不简单地,“研究一下幸福和爱情“,不像一贯人们所做的那样?
This is often the way relationships start "We like each other, I'm physically attracted to each other, I-- to you, I enjoy spending time with you but I'm not making any long-term commitments.
爱情经常以这种形式开场,我们喜欢对方,享受肌肤之亲-,享受一起度过的时光,但不做长远的承诺。
Well, as I say, different theories would try to systematize these examples in different ways; that we don't have any kind of accomplishments, we don't have knowledge, we're not in the right kinds of loving relationships.
就像我所说的,不同的理论会尝试,把这些例子以各种方式归类;,比如我们没有任何的成就,我们没有那种知识,我们得到的是不合适的爱情。
And these aren't necessarily so incompatible but the evolutionary perspective I think would argue that you can feel that kind of love for more than one person or at least it would facilitate the passing on of your genetic material to a larger array of the next generation.
两种观点不太相容,但是持进化论观点的人认为,你可以和两个以上的人拥有完美式的爱情,至少会促进,你的基因传给更多下一代的人。
It's best if you don't know what that is or even if you do mistakenly attribute it, misattribute it, to physical attraction, romance, intimacy, passion and commitment, it's love.
最好是如果你不知道是什么,甚至如果你错误认定,以为是生理吸引力,浪漫,亲密,激情和承诺,那是爱情。
应用推荐