-
So that would probably be de Broglie's answer for why, in fact, we're not observing the wavelength behavior of material on a day-to-day life.
所以那就可能是德布罗意关于,为什么我们无法再日常生活中,观测到物质的波动行为的答案。
-
And that's the kind of instinct I'd like you to get into thinking about. So the answer here is no.
所以答案是否定的,好的，那我们能在线性时间内排序么？
-
So as I say,the soul theory can at least give us an answer that avoids the no branching rule.
所以我说，灵魂理论至少能给我们,一个避开无分支规则的答案。
-
So I've removed the comments, the things that start with slash slash from the slides just so you have an opportunity engage more intellectually rather than just reading the answers off the screen.
我把注释去掉了，那些双斜杠,右边的文字,所以这样你你们可以做一些思考,而不是阅读屏幕上的答案。
-
I think I've heard bits and pieces of the answer everywhere, so I don't want to wait until we get it word-perfect.
我想我可以听到各种各样的答案,所以我不想等这大家想出完美的答案
-
So hopefully if some of you have your calculators with you, you can confirm the answer that I got, which is that the energy is 7.82 times 10 to the -19 joules.
所以如果你们带了计算器,希望你们也能确认一下，我们算出的答案，能量等于,7，82乘以10的-19次方焦耳。
-
So, the answer is both Freud and modern day psychoanalysts would think that medications are substantially overused in the treatment of mental disorders.
所以问题的答案就是,弗洛伊德和当代精神分析学家们都认为,药物治疗在心理障碍的治疗中,被广泛滥用了。
-
So the problem though is that they were looking in the wrong place for the explanation.
所以问题是,他们找答案找错了地方。
-
We have the same basic structure, the same outcomes, but we imagine people cared about different things and we end up with a very different answer.
博弈的结构,结果都一样,但是人们在乎的东西不同了,所以我们得到了完全不同的答案
-
I really didn't know and I needed to have an answer to this question. So I created Star Festival with this team from MIT in order to try to answer this question.
我不知道，我需要一个答案,所以我和我来自麻省的团队,创造了，“七夕“项目,以回答这个问题。
-
Okay, nearly everybody was, so we get surprised when we see these things.
基本上人人都是,所以我们看见答案时很惊讶
-
So the question I want to leave you with today and that I want to pick up again on Wednesday is, ? in the end, what do societies require more of?
所以我今天想留一个问题,下周二你们要得出一个答案，这个问题就是社会更需要什么？
-
So, we need to find another scheme, and that solution was provided for us by G. N. Lewis.
所以我们需要寻找另一个理论来解释，而G。N。Lewis已经提供了答案。
-
And if you come and ask a question that you could have easily answered by doing the reading, coming to lecture, or using Google, they're going to have less patience.
所以如果你过来仅仅是问一个,你能很轻松的,通过阅读、上课、或者，在谷歌上搜索就能得到答案的问题，他们会失去耐心的。
-
Actually it's not 40, I think these are, 75 alright. So the answer is 75 and the number of calls is 1.7 million.
实际上不是4，我觉得，好了，所以答案是5,调用次数是1百70万次。
-
So my answer is always going to be zero and therefore almost always going to be wrong. Yeah?
所以我的答案总会是,因此，几乎这总是错误的，对不？
-
So the most basic answer that doesn't explain why is just to say well, the s orbital is lower in energy than the p orbital, but we now have a more complete answer, so we can actually describe why that is.
所以最基本的答案是那没有解释,所以我们事实上可以描述，为什么是那样，但是我们现在有一个更复杂的答案，又是有效电荷量。
-
The seconds cross out, the kilograms cross out, one of the meters crosses out from the top, so we're left with an answer in meters.
秒消掉了，千克消掉了，单位米和上面的一起约去了，所以我们得到的答案只剩下米。
-
Because in an under-constrained problem there could be multiple solutions. So suppose I want to capture all of them or print all of them out.
因为在一个非约束性问题中,可能会有多组答案,所以假设我想把它们,全部获取或者全部输出。
-
So, cognitive dissonance motivates me to create an answer that's more comfortable for me, "This must be a really wonderful group with a wonderful bunch of people."
所以认知失调促使我想出另一个答案,让我可以接受的答案，“这一定是一个很棒的兄弟会，里面的人都很棒”
-
So you should drop the homework before you come into class, rather than furiously work on it during class, and the solutions will be posted the same afternoon.
所以你应该在进教室之前交作业,而不是在上课的时候乱写一通,作业答案会在当天下午发布到网上
-
So if we start actually pushing ourselves to think about examples-- does it really take one to know one--the answer is, at least as a general claim, it's not true.
所以假如我们开始,深入探讨一些例子,到底需不需要同类才能互知 答案是,至少通常来说,这是不需要的
-
NO So that the more complete answer to the question is that no, we're never going to be able to observe that because of the uncertainty principle it's not possible to observe a velocity that's this slow for a macroscopic object.
所以这个问题的完整答案是，由于不确定性原理,我们不可能测量到这么慢的,宏观物体的速度，希望这个解释。
-
4 So even if the correct mathematical answer is 1.4 or whatever, when you divide an int by an int, you only have room in that variable, in the response for an actual integer.
所以即使那个正确的答案是4,或别的数值，当你用一个整型数除以一个整型数，在那个变量的返回值里，只有,存储一个整型数的空间。
-
So the correct answer for titanium plus two Ar3d2 is going to be argon 3 d 2, whereas if we did not rearrange our order here 4s2 we might have been tempted to write as 4 s 2 so keep that in mind when you're doing the positive ions of corresponding atoms.
所以正2价钛离子,的正确答案是，然而如果我们不重新安排顺序,我们可能会写出2,所以请记住,它当你们在解关于原子,的正离子的时候。
-
So, "Can I survive my death?" Is like asking, "Could I not have yet died after died " The answer is, of course, you have to have died if you died and you haven't survived if you've died.
所以,我能从死亡中幸存下来么,就成了,我死了之后还能活着吗,答案很明显,既然你死了那就是死了,没能幸存下来就是死了
-
So it's not, as I say altogether straightforward to see how the answer " "Death is bad for me, because when I'm dead I don't exist" how that answers the problem as opposed to simply focusing our attention on the problem ? How can nonexistence be bad for me?
所以这并不是，就像我说的,那么简单可以领会到这个答案,“死亡对我来说不好，因为我死了我就不存在了“,如何回答了这个问题,和我们仅仅把关注点放在问题本身相反,不存在怎么可能对我来说有坏处呢？
-
For those of you just walking in now, you might not have a chance to get all of the thought process that you need in on this clicker question, because it is based on a Lewis structure, so we will go over it.
那些刚刚进来的同学，你们可能没有机会时间来回答,因为答案是基于Lewis结构上的,所以我们赶紧看一下。
-
And, so, what that tells us is HF is polar.
所以这个答案告诉我们HF是极性的。
应用推荐