All I'm saying is that if someday we found that, at that point,we'd have an argument for the soul.
我要说的是,如果有一日我们发现这种情况,那时候才会有灵魂存在的论据。
Well, that's the case only, I say in conclusion, if we can distinguish between meaning and significance.
那么,那只能是这种情况,我总结性地说,如果我们能够区分开什么是意思什么是意义的话。
And the change was, that in this case, if I'm doing a single search, I've got a choice.
这个改变是,在这种情况下,如果我要做单一检索,我就面临一个选择。
If we lowered the degree of synergy, what would happen to the effort level that we'd find by this method? What would happen?
如果我们降低了协同度,在这种情况下,结果会是什么样的呢
So if he came up with the idea, that's the only kind of consent we could have confidence in morally then it would be okay.
所以如果是他自己提出的,除非他是在这种情况下的同意,才能确信说,道德上没问题。
And, one other thing that I failed to point out, if you take a look at the energies associated with the outermost electrons, in this case, lithium, you see it's 0.5 megajoules per mole, and then what's the 6.26?
还有另外一点我忘记提到的是,如果你观察离最外层,的电子的能量,在这种情况,对于锂,你可以得到,它是每摩尔0。5兆焦,那么6。26是什么呢?
But in keeping with the focus of our discussion about the badness of death, I want to put aside the moral question ? and think about how good or bad for me ? is it that there's variability in death?
但是为了重点讨论,死亡的坏处,我要撇开道德问题不谈,转而考虑这种情况对我是好是坏,如果死亡有可变性的话?
This would be? Well let's think through this in one additional way and that is--notice that in duple meter we have a strong beat, right "Strong, weak, strong, weak, strong, weak, strong weak" in that sense or if we have triple it would be "Strong, weak, weak, strong, weak, weak."
是什么呢,我们用另一种方式来想,这个,你们知道二拍子,有很强的鼓点,对吧,强,弱,强,弱,强,弱,强,弱,那在这种情况下如果我们拿一段三拍子,那就会是,强,弱,弱,强,弱,弱
I could have used if b is equal to 0, the answer is 1, that would have also worked.
如果b等于0的话,答案是1,这种情况也能解决。
应用推荐