And what does that say? It says, let's assume I want to do k searches of a list. OK.

如果我们假定要在列表中做k次搜索,在线性的情况下，假定是一个未排序的情况。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

If you assume that, you are not playing by the rule, we don't know what force it exerts.

如果你假定了,那你就犯规了,我们不知道它施加了多大的力

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

So, presumably, if we follow our rules so far only one of these should be correct.

那么，可以假定，如果我们按照之前的规则,应该只有一个是正确的。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So if the argument's going to be, "We need to posit the existence of a soul in order to explain creativity," Again, that just seems wrong.

所以如果这个论证要说,我们必须假定灵魂的存在,才能解释创造力,再一次,这看起来是错误的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Another way of saying that, stop me if this is wrong, but one way to say that is we've been assuming that politics is one dimensional, left/right and there might be other things involved: character or even among issues, even among political issues it could be more than one dimension.

换句话说就是,如果我说错了请纠正,换种说法就是,我们把政治假定为单一维度的,非左即右,然而它还涉及其他方面,比如性格问题,即使政治事务的处理也不是单一维度的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So, that's a more complete quantum mechanical picture of what is going on here.

对它，更完整的描述,如果我们,假定径向概率分布。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选