Let's assume, for sake of argument, the thing I'm looking for is bigger than this. In that case, I'm going to throw away all of this, I'm going to hit that bottom line of that code.
让我们假定不是,假定要找的元素,比这个大,在这样的情况下,这些都擦掉,我要运行到代码的最后一行。
It will soften your speech so that you can pose the question without offending the other person.
它会很好地柔化你的言辞,这样你就可以在不冒犯其他人的情况下提出自己的问题。
And then he adds this important provision, "At least where there is enough, and as good " left in common for others."
并加上了这一重要补充,“至少在留有足够同样好的东西,共有的情况下,是这样的“
So at the end of the day we're not gonna get out of this need to compare, at least in this context of cups that have weights or ints that have values.
最终我们也无法改变要进行比较的需要,至少在有重量的杯子或者,整数的情况下是这样的。
And, if you'd like to change, you can do so only with the permission of the administrator.
如果你们想要更改时间,只能在课程管理主任允许的情况下,这样做。
My first question is, to what extent can investors like us adopt your strategy of buying cheap ? and expecting the value of a company to go up?
第一个问题是,在什么情况下像我们这样的投资者,才能采纳您“低点买入,期待上涨,高价卖出“的策略呢?
So, let's take a look at one of these rows in more detail to think about why this might be happening, and it turns out the reason that these glitches occur are because the sub shell structure predominates in certain instances, and that's where these glitches take place.
那么,让我们仔细地看一看其中一行,想一想为什么会这样,结果是这些小偏差的出现,是因为在一定情况下,亚壳层结构会产生重要影响,这正发生在小偏差出现的地方。
If you're expecting to be attacked and besieged, as all these citadels would be by an invader, you would want more than anything else a water supply, but they didn't necessarily have good water supplies in such circumstances.
如果你预料到会被攻击和包围,就像这些城邦面对侵略者那样,你最关心的一定是水源供应,但在这样的情况下,他们未必能找到充足的水源
If you wish to change sections, you may do so only with permission of the subject administrators because it's very important that those sections be kept at a small population.
如果你们想要改时间,你只能在课程管理主任允许,的情况下这样做,因为让课程的人数保持在比较少的水平,是很重要的。
What is the probability distribution for x/n in that case?
在这样的情况下,x/n的概率分布是怎样的
应用推荐