Now, let's come back to the question we started with, which has to do with profits and so on in society.
现在我们来回答刚讲课时提到的问题,是与社会现实中的利润有关的问题
I would suggest to you that the difference in your response and the critics is the difference that feminism in the '70s made.
我想说的是你们的回答与评论家们的区别,正是女权运动在70年代造成的区别。
Most of us think we have so far to go before we can answer questions like Huxley's question.
多数心理学家与哲学家都认为在能够回答,诸如赫胥黎提出的这类问题之前,还需要做大量的研究才行
And part of the reason for putting it up is that I want to, as much as possible, answer that question by separating out the mechanism, which is the computer from computational thinking. Right.
提出这个问题的原因有一部分在于,我想尽量,将计算机与,计算思维分开,来回答它。
To some degree, I am inclined to answer that both of those questions have something to them.
某种程度看来,我倾向于回答这两个问题,皆与之有关连。
What you said was true, but I wanted something specifically about domination here.
你刚才说的是对的,但我想要得到与优势有关的回答
Again, I'm happy to answer any questions you guys have about that, but the first concept sheet has to do with this website and I'll come back to that in just a minute.
我很乐意回答你们这方面的问题,第一次作业应该与网站相关,我待会会说
In it he asks "What is the intellectual quality that successful statesmen possess that distinguishes their knowledge "? from all other forms of rationality and knowledge?"
书中他提问,“何种智力特质,是成功政治家们所应具备,以使其知识有别于,所有其它种类的理性与知识,他的回答如下“
It is this Socrates who is brought up on charges of corruption and impiety yet none of this quite answers the question of what is the nature of Socrates' crime.
这是被控腐化,与亵渎神明的苏格拉底,但这都未能完整地回答,苏格拉底所背罪名的本质究竟为何。
That seems to be one way of making sense of the city/soul hypothesis, but again it doesn't seem to answer the question ? in what way are cities and individuals alike.
那似乎是,解释城灵假说的一种方式,但似乎仍未回答基本的问题,城市与个人间到底有何相似之处。
And Socrates' answer is, of course, the predation of poetry and the arts in Books II and III.
苏格拉底的回答是,当然,见第,II,与,III,册中,对诗学与艺术的描述。
应用推荐