So inspiration,contrary to modern assumptions was not the criteria you hear ancient people talk about.

所以与现代观点相反,神启性不是古代人的考虑标准。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

But that formulation seems in many ways to be question begging. How much precision does the subject allow? How do we know?

所允许之外的精准,但这样的逻辑本身即,在很多方面启人疑窦？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

It involves a stone, a piece of lapis lazuli that has a kind of a flaw in it, which is like a "water-course," and where one can imagine a pilgrim climbing toward increased enlightenment.

提到了一块石头,一块有瑕疵的青金石，就像河道“,我们可以想象,一个朝圣者慢慢靠近神启。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

there were lots of texts that were inspired, and there were different levels of inspiration.

有很多神启的论著，而且神启程度不同。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

If it's not necessarily apostleship,and it's not inspiration, what are the real reasons?

如果它不一定与使徒职分有关，与神启性无关，那真正的原因是什么？

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

Why is it canon?" And most Christians will say, "Because it is inspired."

为什么这是正典？“大多数基督教徒会说，“因为它具有神启性“

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选