I'd really like to have that modularity that says, I'm only going to get access to the values, not by calling their names, but by calling some specific method to get access to their names.

这样我们就丢掉了代码的模块化,我很希望代码有这样的模块化：,我访问变量的值，不是通过直接调用它们的名字，而是通过调用某个可以,访问这些变量名的方法来访问。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

But this choice of names, both for my functions and also for my parameters or my variables is completely up to me.

但是这个名字的选择，包括我的函数名,和我的参数名,或者变量名都是我定义的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Twenty-eight keywords that are blocked?

有28个关键词不能被当作变量名？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

If I wanted to use print as a variable name, how do I get the system to decide gee, do I want print as a value for something, or do I want print as a command?

如果我把print当做一个变量名，我如何让系统来决定，我是要把print当做一个命令来用呢，还是要把它当做一个变量名来用呢？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

And just as with variables, you should use some common sense, some style here, and the function's name should X Y communicate what it does, calling it X or Y or Z is generally not all that helpful.

就像变量，你使用一些常识，一些类型，和函数名需要,传达它所做的事情，把它叫做,或者Z通常是没有什么用处的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

But here, if I decide I'm going to store things not in x and y, but with some other set of names, for example, I've gotta go back into these pieces of code that use the points, and change them. So I've lost modularity.

除了要改下借口,但是这里，如果我决定，我不把值放在x和y中，而是和其他一些变量名进行绑定,例如这样的话,我就得回到使用这个点的代码，那儿去做更改了。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选