The idea is that people don't see this basic risk management problem and they see things in entirely different terms.

该思想的关键在与人们并没有看到,其中本质的基本风险管理问题,而是站在完全不同的角度去看问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Yeah, I don't know, I think it's a, it's probably willingness to take risks.

我不清楚，
我觉得可能得有去承担风险的意愿。

要想成为事业家 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

.. So, we have to frame things as-- put things in the mental categories-- presentation matters-- so that people can manage their risks right.

因此由于框架效应-,我们会把事物按照心理类别分类-,所以得注意使用正确的表述方式-,以便去恰当的进行风险管理。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Generally,you don't have to worry about optionality or call provisions and so it's math.

一般来说,没有必要去担心期权性风险,或赎回条款,就只是数学游戏

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Now, in the posing the question that way, I've been assuming that these are things you'd do despite the fact that they run the risk of death.

现在，以这种方式提出了这个问题，我已经假设了存在尽管带有死亡的风险,但你仍会去做的事情。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

by asking, which of them are so valuable you'd be prepared to do them even if they would introduce what isn't otherwise there, ? namely, the risk of death?

通过问自己，什么事如此有价值,以至于你准备好要去做,即便它们会带来如果不去做就不会有的，也就是，死亡的风险？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I suppose there's a further question we have to ask, are there things that would be worth doing precisely ? because of the fact that they introduced the risk of death?

我假设我们还有一个更深层的问题要去回答，有没有事情是值得去做的正是因为,它们会带来死亡的风险？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选