Same way that I have multiplication or division as a primitive, functions are going to give me, or somebody else who wrote them for me as part of a library, a new primitive that I'm going to be able to use.
我在用乘法或者除法当做原语,这些函数,或者别人写程序库中的函数,将会给我返回一个,我能使用的新原语。
And the Ancient Near Eastern listener would prick up their ears: I thought I knew this story.
那些古代近东的听众们都竖起耳朵:,我原以为我知道这个故事。
The strategies that are less than 67 but bigger than 45, I think these strategies are not, they're not dominated strategies in the original game.
对于选择大于45而小于67的数,我认为他们并不是,在原博弈中并不是劣势策略
Now, we're going to listen to a piece of music here from the tradition of classical India and I thought we might have a sitar player in here.
现在,我们要听一段,传统的印度古典音乐,我原以为我们能请来一位锡塔尔琴手
Those two examples I just gave you, one had to directly inject a gene containing vector into the pronucleus of a fertilized egg and you don't have that opportunity in adults.
在我刚给出的两个例子里,一个必须得将带有目的基因的载体,直接注射到受精卵的原核中,这在成年人身上行不通
I'm going to look sort of with some care at these passages - so all will become clear, but particularly in this: Sidney-- and I didn't exactly quote the passage in which Sidney does this - but I urged you to believe that he does-- Sidney actually ranks poetry somewhere between divinity and the other sciences.
我会重点讲这点,等我讲完你们就明白了-,我不读他的原句了,但我想让你们知道,西德尼的确-,将诗歌排在了,神学和其他科学之间。
So the very last two lines of code I'm saying this, s2 the original string is s1, the copy of the string is s2, but if I haven't lost you, what are we really going to see when we print this?
最后两行代码是这样的,原字符串是s1,那个字符串的拷贝是,但是如果我没有忘记,当我们打印的时候,我们将看到什么?
The legal subject is the father; he has lost a child. So I have to suffer the literal punishment, as a father, I have to lose my child. Right?
法律主体是父亲,他失去了孩子,作为父亲,我也必须,遭受原义惩罚,失去我自己的孩子,对吧?
应用推荐