If you don't have the units, then if you say the answer is 19, then we don't know what it means.
如果没有的话,比如你的答案是十九,那我们就不知道这是什么意思
Gosh, the answer to that is, again, duh! No. You couldn't possibly survive your death, given the very definition.
答案当然是,不可能,你不可能死后逃生,这是毋庸置疑的
But when you asked them why they didn't try it the answers tended to be "I would look silly."
但当你问他们为什么不尝试时,他们的答案往往是“这样做会很傻”
Second thing we've got to worry about is, what's a basic step? All right, if I bury a whole lot of computation inside of something, I can say, wow, this program, you know, runs in one step. Unfortunately, that one step calls the Oracle at Delphi and gets an answer back. Maybe not quite what you want.
我们需要担心的第二件事情就是,什么该作为一个基本的步骤呢?,如果我把一大堆的计算过程放到里面,我可以说,噢,这个程序你知道的,一步就完成了,不幸的是,这一步可能要靠预言家才能得到答案,这可能跟你想要的结果不太相同吧。
Everyone knows from calculus that if you're trying to find a function about which you know only the derivative, you can always add a constant to one person's answer without changing anything.
学过微积分的人都知道,如果你想根据已知的导数,求出其原函数,你总是可以给某人的答案,随便加一个常数,且不影响结果
Now, you could look at adult zebras all day long and you're never going to figure this out.
就算你整天盯着成年斑马看,也永远都找不出答案来
You might think the answer to that is no if we are physicalists but in fact it's not so clear the answer is no.
如果我们是物理主义者你可能认为,人不可能肉体不死,但其实答案没有那么明确。
But the answer to your question in the end is, " "no."
但最终,你这个问题的答案是,“不相信“
I don't know. I'll find out for you for next class though.
我不知道,下节课告诉你答案。
your answer is "no."
你的答案也是“不“
You can add something else to the answer without invalidating it, and that is anything with one power of t in it, because if you take one derivative it'll survive, but if you take two derivatives, it'll get wiped out.
你可以往答案后面加上其它东西,而且不影响结果,也就是任何t的一次项,因为你求一次导数之后它还在,但如果你求两次导数,这一项就不存在了
The answer is: You don't bury the survivors, because survivors are people that haven't yet died.
答案是,你不需要埋葬幸存者,因为幸存者就是那些还没死的人
应用推荐