-
Why this struggle, and why must Milton struggle with such awkward metaphysical categories in order simply to address properly the power of light?
为什么弥尔顿必须,与这样一个奇怪的抽象的东西斗争,仅仅是为了恰当的描述光明的力量？
-
We can't actually go ahead and derive this equation of the wave function squared, because no one ever derived it, it's just an interpretation, but it's an interpretation that works essentially perfectly.
从这个方程中,导出，波函数的平方，没有人可以这样做，这仅仅是一种解释，但这种解释，能解释的很好，自从它第一次被提出来之后。
-
The answer is that simply knowing the particle has an acceleration is not enough to tell you where the particle will be.
答案是这样的,仅仅知道质点的加速度,是不足以告诉你它接下来的运动的
-
It would be utterly inadequate for us to account for this institutional and surreal institutional power that Milton holds over us by stating blandly that Milton is the greatest English poet.
要解释弥尔顿为什么能对我们施加,这样硬性的甚至荒诞的控制,仅仅说弥尔顿是最伟大的英国诗人是远远不足的。
-
It's not just that, as we'll see, it's a great many other things too.
并不仅仅是这样的，我们也都知道说，还有很多的事情于此有关。
-
And that's when things really get interesting and so this just hints at the types of thinking that one can derive from the field of computer science and apply either to the field itself of computer science, or whatever domain it is that you are here too study.
这样就开始有意思起来了,这仅仅是我们从计算机科学领域,获得的一些思维方式上的启示,这种思维方式不仅适用于计算机科学本身，也同样可以应用在其他的学习领域。
-
Now, if we push the dualist to explain what is it about free will that rules out the possibility that we are merely physical objects, I think the natural suggestion to spell out the argument goes like this, and this is where we were at the end of last time.
现在如果我们让二元论者去解释,什么是自由意志,它又是如何否定,人仅仅是物理实体这种可能性的,我认为他们自然会这样,阐述这个论证,这是就我们在上节课结束时讲到的内容
-
There's a very similar Egyptian creation story Actually in which the god Ptah just wills "let this be."
埃及也有一个类似的创世故事,在这个故事中，上帝Ptahr，意愿仅仅是“就这样吧”
-
But that's not enough because computers at the end 1 of the day only understand 0s and 1s and what you and is clearly not a collection of 0s and 1s.
但是仅仅这样是不够的，计算机,最终只会认识0和,你现在得到的，c的文件显然不是0，1的合集。
应用推荐