I guess when you put markets on it that doesn't sound like public finance but, even so, it could.
我想当你用到“市场“二字时,听起来跟公共财政就是两码事了,尽管如此,两者仍有关联。
You remember they're wandering around the forest without her picking berries. The younger brother, - the second brother, is most concerned about his sister's safety -- so I want you to look at this passage.
你们记得他们在树林中游荡,没有拿他们采摘的果子,小哥哥,也就是二哥哥,是最关心他妹妹安全的-,所以我想让你们看这篇文章。
I was thinking this morning four, five, six, one, two, three, four, five, six, one, two.
我早上还在想这段,四,五,六,一,二,三,四,五,六,一,二
So Socrates has what he wants, once we give him premise number two, that the eternal, non-physical can only be grasped by the eternal, non-physical.
所以如果我们同意他的前提二,苏格拉底就得到了他想要的,前提二说永恒,非现实的事物,只能被永恒,非现实的事物认知
So the question I want to leave you with today and that I want to pick up again on Wednesday is, ? in the end, what do societies require more of?
所以我今天想留一个问题,下周二你们要得出一个答案,这个问题就是社会更需要什么?
For example,to have--to give the impression of being provincial with-- like you just arrived at the train from Brittany in Gare Montparnasse, and you're just so totally out of it and then that's all you want to do, and you're sort of clueless.
例如,里面描述了乡下人的行为,就像你刚到了布列塔尼的蒙帕纳斯火车站,你一无所知,你当时却饥肠辘辘想急于充饥,简直就像丈二和尚
Often a good thing to start with is to put the lowest ionization energy atom in the middle, and if you don't have charge separation then go with that structure, but if you do find you have a lot of separation, such as the case in negative 2, positive 2, and minus 1, then you want to say wait a second, this is really bad in terms of formal charge, let me go ahead and see what other options I have here.
通常一开始把电离能最低的原子,放在中心位置就很好了,如果你发现电荷没有分开,那么这个结构就没问题了,但是如果你发现有很多分开的电荷,比如这种情况,有负二,正二和负一,那么你会想要说等一下,从形式电荷来看这很不好,让我去看看其它可能的选择。
Still, all I can say is, why should we believe two?
然而我想问,为什么我们要相信前提二
Suppose you wanted two plus two to equal five.
假设你想让二加二等于五。
And it just goes like this, Feel the duple.
就想这样,感受二拍子
Two--let me say something about this.
二,我想解释一下这一点
This would be? Well let's think through this in one additional way and that is--notice that in duple meter we have a strong beat, right "Strong, weak, strong, weak, strong, weak, strong weak" in that sense or if we have triple it would be "Strong, weak, weak, strong, weak, weak."
是什么呢,我们用另一种方式来想,这个,你们知道二拍子,有很强的鼓点,对吧,强,弱,强,弱,强,弱,强,弱,那在这种情况下如果我们拿一段三拍子,那就会是,强,弱,弱,强,弱,弱
While I'm busy pointing out ways in which the argument doesn't succeed, I also want to just take a moment and mention that premise two is also subject to criticism.
当我竭力指出,为什么这种论证无法成功时,我也想要花点时间,顺便说说前提二也不能免于批评
Now I say this not so much to depress the hell out of you, but partly to warn you, and to make it clear that I believe that it's a skill.
我说这些不是想吓坏你们,只是,一,警告你们一下,二,说清楚,我相信这只是一种技能。
应用推荐