Both Hartman and Fish argued that the rhetorical strategies of Milton's similes work to reinforce the theological categories of good and evil.

哈特曼和费什都论述到这里修辞上的策略,起到了加强,善与恶在神学层面上的区分。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

By the way, I'm going to leave also to your sections the strange confusion that ensues in taking a rhetorical device, metonymy, and making it synonymous with grammar on the axis of combination.

另外，我还将把奇怪的困惑留给你们思考,这个困惑随着使用修辞学策略和转喻而产生，并使得它在结合轴上与语法有着同样的意思。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

So your position may be not believed, and I want to claim that that's connected to the idea that you can't commit yourself to your policies.

也就是说选民未必相信你的立场,我要指出的是这与,你无法执行相应政治策略是相关的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Does this policy of principled disobedience, you might say vindicate or indict Socrates of the charge of corruption and impiety ? that has been brought against him?

这种原则性反抗的策略，可说是证明,或判定苏格拉底,腐化与亵渎神明,罪名的证据吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Notice this game is not symmetric in the payoffs or in the strategies.

但注意此博弈的策略与收益是非对称的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The main textbook is this one, Dutta's book Strategy and Games.

主要是这本,杜塔的《策略与博弈》

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So very similar idea, but the only thing is, I'm slightly abusing notation here by saying that my payoff depends on my strategy and a belief, but what I really mean is my expected payoff.

这和以前的概念差不多,唯一的不同,就是我这里稍微用了一些数学符号,来表述策略带来的收益与所持信念有关,这里的收益指的是预期收益

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

For each q2 that you give me or that Player 2 chooses, I want to find out and draw what is Player 1's best response.

对与参与人2的每个策略q2,我想知道参与人1的最佳对策是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So similarly, I would find that ?2 2 equals 1 plus B S1 and this is the best response of Player II, as it depends on Player I's choice of effort S1.

同理可得?2等于1+B*S1,?2是参与人II的最佳对策,因为它与参与人I的策略S1有关

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选