And the reason we won't talk any more about this Bohr model is because, of course, it's not correct.

它是不正确的,所以我们不会,在这上面。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So if you're not in this 77%, let's quickly go over why, in fact, this is the correct answer, . 9 times 10 to the negative 18 joules.

如果你们不在这77%中，让我们快速的来看一看为什么，这个是正确答案，0，9乘以10的负18次方焦耳。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So, among the lessons you'll hopefully exist this course with is not just how to make something correct.

通过这些经验教训，我希望你们在这个课程中,不仅仅是知道怎样去把事情做对。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Can this possibly be correct? I hope it can. No, it is not correct.

才不是呢，瞎说骗你们玩儿的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

All right. We've got a big majority, and both are logical ways of thinking, but it turns out that the majority is correct, which is not always the case, but the electron is not ejected in this case.

好，大多数人都这么认为，这两种看法都是合乎逻辑的，但结果是大多数人是对的，这种情况不经常发生，但是电子在这种情况下,确实不会被逐出。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

This is a good way to actually check if your Lewis structure is correct or not.

这是检验你的路易斯结构,是否正确的一个好方法。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

It is not correct, for instance, for me to do this.

例如，我这样做是不正确的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选