"Should we boycott BP and then expect them to pay for everything,"

VOA: standard.2010.06.10

We should be able to try all things, to prove all things, and then decide whether or not we actually like it, whether it brings us some sort of pleasure or wisdom.

我们应该尝试所有东西，证实所有事情，然后决定我们是否真正喜欢它，它是否能带给我们快乐和智慧。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

Then, where should we go for dessert?

那我们要去哪儿吃甜点呢？

纽约的夜晚生活 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

So we can do this for any final charge we have, if we have a molecule that has a charge of plus 2, then all of the formal charges should add up to plus 2 and so on.

对于任意净电荷的情况,我们都可以这样做，比如假设我们有一个带两个正电荷的分子，那么所有的形式电荷加起来应该等于正二，等等。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

Why, then, should we not study the acquisition of a cognitive structure like language more or less as we study some complex bodily organ?

我们为什么不应当,像研究某些复杂身体器官那样,去或多或少地研究,像语言这样的认知结构的习得

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

The question we want to turn to, then, is, "Which of these two views should we believe: the dualist position or the physicalist position?"

接下来,我们的问题是,这两种观点,我们到底应该相信哪一种,二元论还是物理主义

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

OK. So that then leads to the question about what should we do about this?

那我们应该怎么去,解决这个问题呢？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

And before we do it, I should add one other thing: how, then, do we get these other notes up here, we get these other notes up here?

在此之前,我们先来看看这个,我们如何安排其它这些音符,放在这里吗

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

Is this all okay? If we're all going to die then does it really mean that we should just do the best we can at anybody's expense while we're alive?

这样真的可以吗,如果我们终难免一死,这就意味着我们可以在活着的时候,可以不惜代价,去更好的满足自己吗

耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

Now Brooks then uses these terms in ways that should be familiar to us, as I say. We have now been amply exposed to them in reading Jakobson and de Man.

而就想我之前说过的那样，布鲁克斯，用一种我们熟悉的方式运用这两个词,我们在读雅各布森和德曼的著作时已经充分见识过了。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Then what should we do there?

我们去那儿该做点什么呢？

卡姆登最棒 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

If food has addictive properties, and we'll discuss this in the class, then is this the sort of thing that should get regulated by government?

如果食品具有成瘾性,我们会在这门课里讨论,关于这类食品,是否也应该受到政府管制呢

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

So what Christine is arguing is, even though it's the case that 2 is not a dominated strategy, if we do the process of iterative deletion of dominated strategies and we delete the dominated strategies, then maybe we should look again and see if it's dominated now.

克里斯汀说的是,即使选择立场2不是劣势策略,如果我们迭代剔除劣势策略,然后我们剔除掉了劣势策略,然后再来回头看看还有没有劣势策略了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Should we say then that you're dead?

我们可以说你死了吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, if that's right, then should we say that the pervasiveness of death, ubiquitousness of death-- the thing that I was earlier suggesting was oppressive-- wouldn't it really be nice to have a death-free time or a death-free location or death-free activities?

如果是这样的话，那我们是不是应该说死亡的普遍性，死亡的无处不在性-,这些我之前所说的特征是不对的-,如果有死亡免疫时间或者死亡免疫地点,或者死亡免疫活动岂不是很好吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

OK, in a few minutes we're going to start talking then about what is computation, how are we going to start building those tools, but that's what you should take away, that's what you're going to gain out of this course by the time you're done.

好啦，我们会花一点儿时间,谈谈什么是计算，我们如何去建造这些工具，但是这些是你应该，在离开这个课堂时,应该学会的事儿。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

If the following is the right description, then we perhaps should say they're still alive.

如果以下描述是正确的，我们就该说他们还活着。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I then want to take the time to consider whether or not we should believe this and how well it fits with our modern science.

接下来的时间我想来和大家讨论一下,弗洛伊德的理论是否可信,以及弗洛伊德的理论,在多大程度上是符合现代科学的。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

And that idea was, we make a guess in the middle, we test it so this is kind of a guess and check, and if the answer was too big, then we knew that we should be looking over here. If it was too small, we knew we should be looking over here, and then we would repeat.

这些有理数是有序排列的,然后我们的想法是,首先在中间取个数作为猜想数，然后对这个猜想数进行验证，如果由猜想数得到的答案太大,我们知道应该跳过，比猜想数大的那个区间，如果太小的话。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选