-
Abbas Milani, an analyst at The Hoover Institution, "I certainly know of no time in Iranian history where the democratic discourse, and the social basis of democracy have been as strong."
VOA: standard.2010.06.11
-
This question of determinism is as important in the discourse of literary theory as the question of skepticism.
在文学理论的话语中,决定论的问题和怀疑论的问题是同等重要的。
-
That's why the poem, the lyric poem, is privileged among the forms of literary discourse in the New Criticism.
这就是为什么诗，一首抒情诗，在新批评派眼里要优于其他各种文学形式。
-
Because they represent dimensions of experience formerly excluded from the elevated, idealized discourse that is poetry, dimensions of experience excluded as prosaic.
因为它们分别代表了原先经验的多维化,却将提升的理想化的论道即诗歌排除在外，将无趣的经验也排除在外。
-
But the fact that this type of report the goverment published itself suggest that they are thinking about it and once it becomes part of the public discourse this typle of issue... some action is likely to follow.
政府自身愿意写出这种报告,从另一角度说明,他们在思考这个问题,一旦这个问题受到公共瞩目,这类问题。,就可能有人开始动手解决。
-
Well, it is the disclosure of error that other forms of discourse supposing themselves to refer to things remain unaware of.
好的，这揭露了一种错误，也就是,其它文体假设自己指出了其它一些人们从未意识到的问题。
-
There is discourse, and to think about the field of texts is to think about something which is full of difference.
话语是存在的,与文本非常不同。
-
Metaphor is the bringing together in a statement of identity of the discourse that's attempting to articulate itself.
比喻就是表述,试图自我阐明交谈特点的过程。
-
Again and again he says that the important thing is to insist on the difference between literature and other forms of discourse.
他一遍又一遍地说，重要的是坚持,文学和其它文体间的不同。
-
Simply because of doubt about the generic integrity of various forms of discourse.
仅仅因为怀疑,不同形式话语的普遍的完整性。
-
Foucault continues, Instead, these questions will be raised: "How, under what conditions, and in what forms can something like a subject appear in the order of discourse?
福柯继续说，取而代之的，这些问题会被问到：“哪种情况下，一个类似主题的东西会如何,以什么形式的话语顺序出现？
-
One of the reasons this understanding seems so problematic is the idea that we don't appeal to the authority of an author in making our mind about the nature of a given field of discourse.
这种理解之所以看起来有问题,一个原因就是我们不会为了弄清一个特定领域话语的本质,去诉求作者的权威。
-
There are relevant and interesting fields of discourse and there are completely irrelevant fields of discourse, and some of these fields are on the sides of angelic discourse and some of these fields are on the side of the demonic.
有和话语相关的有趣的领域,也有完全不相关的领域，一些领域有如天使一般,而另一些则如恶魔。
-
Foucault couldn't possibly allow for that because plainly the whole texture of their discourse would be undermined by introducing the notion that it's okay to be a master, and yet Ricoeur feels that these figures dominate modern thought as masters.
福柯不会认同因为,这样的话他们话语的整个结构就会被破坏,如果引入可以作为大师的观点的话，同时,里克尔感觉这些人支配着现代大师的思想。
-
In the interest of time, I'm going to skip over a few other passages that I was going to read to you in reinforcement of this insistence, on de Man's part, that literature differs from other forms of discourse, the remaining question being: literature differs from other forms of discourse how?
由于时间关系，我将忽略一些其它的文章,我本想念给你们听，来巩固对这个主张的理解，对于德曼，文学与其它问题形式不同，剩下的问题是：,文学怎样与其它文体不同？
-
Notice, in fact, the cleverness of all this discourse in the poem!
注意，事实上，整篇诗歌语言的巧妙！
-
Sidney's talking about the various kinds of discourse: - divinity, hymnody, science, philosophy, history-- in other words, all the ways in which you can contribute to human betterment and human welfare. He says in the case of all but one of them, each discourse is a "serving science."
西德尼进行了很多方面的阐述：,神学，赞美诗，科学，哲学，历史-,换句话说，所有你能想到的,对人类福祉有益处的方式,他说这里面除了诗学，其他都是“服务性学科“
应用推荐