The Apology shows Socrates as offering a new model of citizenship a new kind of citizen.

苏格拉底自辩篇》显示出苏格拉底,欲提出一种新模式的公民权，一种新型态的公民。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

The question is, why does Socrates exhibit such proud defiance and independence of the laws in the Apology, and such total, even kind of mouse-like, acquiescence to the laws in the Crito?

问题是，为何苏格拉底一方面展现了自豪的反抗,及独立于法律之外如同《自辩篇》所载，但这种绝对性，却化为鼠辈般，默认了全部的法律，一如《克里托篇》所载？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Not only does the Apology force Socrates to defend himself before the city of Athens but Socrates puts the city of Athens on trial and makes it defend itself before the high court of philosophy.

苏格拉底自辩篇》不仅迫使苏格拉底,在雅典城前自辩,他也迫使雅典全城受审,而且让它自辩于,哲学的最高法院面前。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

And here are the words of his that I want to leave you with today from section : 31d of the Apology. Socrates writes "This is what opposes my political activity.

今天的总结要引用他讲的话,摘自《苏格拉底自辩篇》31d段落,苏格拉底写道,“这违背了我的政治活动。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

And in the Apology, the speech between Socrates and the laws that form, as it were the kind of central action of the dialogue, Anytus presents the case that Meletus and Anytus should have made against him.

则在《自辩篇》中,苏格拉底与城邦的法律，这几乎是语录的中心诉讼点，呈现的便是，Meletus及,应拿来对付他的论点。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选