-
If souls are simples and simples can't split, there's no possibility of having two things with a relevant soul.
如果灵魂是单纯无法分割的，就没有两个实体拥有相同灵魂的可能。
-
I don't think we got any good reason to believe that soul existed before we were born.
我认为没什么好的理由让我们相信,灵魂在我们出生前就已存在。
-
The soul for Milton though isn't distinct from body. It is the body.
在弥尔顿看来灵魂并不与肉体格格不入，灵魂就是肉体。
-
Because I don't see the compassion, it presents a false sort of beauty that doesn't go to what is really going on in my soul, which is very conflicted often. -Right.
因为我看不到其中情感的相同，他们呈现的是一种虚假的美丽,它和我灵魂经历的一切并不相关，而我经历的通常是矛盾与冲突，-的确。
-
It won't be me,if it's a different soul.
如果他有另一个灵魂，那就不是我。
-
Of course,that soul won't remember being Shelly Kagan.
当然那灵魂不会记得作为Shelly，Kagan的记忆。
-
If the soul is immaterial, doesn't it follow automatically, trivially, that the soul can't be destroyed by a material process?
如果灵魂是无形的,是否可以顺理成章地得出,灵魂无法被实体过程所摧毁呢
-
Why aren't I allowing the soul theory to say, "Don't blame us. We don't know how to explain it yet."
而又为什么不允许灵魂理论说,别责怪我们,我们只是还不知道怎么去解释
-
Since what we want to know is whether the soul is immortal, how do we know it can't break.
既然我们想知道,灵魂是否不朽，我们怎么知道它会不会破裂呢。
-
If a soul can't split, you can't end up with pieces of the soul or the remnants of the soul in both.
如果灵魂不能分裂，就不可能两个身体都拥有部分灵魂。
-
When you think about the possibility of bare survival of the scrubbed, clean,erased soul,you see that survival wasn't really everything you wanted.
当你想到，存活下去的仅是被清洗过的灵魂，你就会发现存活下去对你来说并无关紧要。
-
If this argument doesn't work, is there another argument for the existence of a soul that you think is a better one?
如果这个论点没有说服力,有没有其他更具说服力的论点,来论述灵魂的存在呢
-
Please don't go away thinking that what I just said is, here's a new argument for the soul.
请别就理所当然地想着我刚才说的，觉得灵魂的存在又有了新的论据。
-
The one we started with-- you need the soul to explain the animation of the body-- that argument, I think, doesn't work.
我们一开始提到的那个观点,你需要灵魂来解释肉体的生命力,我想那个论点并不成立
-
Simmias says we can't conclude that the soul is indestructible because we should not believe the subconclusion 4 invisible things can't be destroyed.
他说我们不能得出结论说,灵魂不朽或几乎不朽或其他什么,因为我们不该相信,4这个结论4,即无形的东西不可毁灭。
-
Doesn't it follow that a soul, an immaterial entity, can't be destroyed by a material, physical process?
而灵魂这种,无形的实体,是否会遵循这个规律被物质,也就是物理过程摧毁呢
-
And then if 5 is true that the soul is really invisible, we are entitled to conclude 6 The soul can't be destroyed.
然后如果5正确,即灵魂确实无形，我们有资格得出6这个结论6,灵魂不会毁灭。
-
Even if recycling takes place, we don't have any good reason yet to believe that the soul is one of the recycled parts.
即使循环的确发生了,我们并没有很好的理由来相信,灵魂就是一个循环的部件
-
You don't have to say that having the very same soul is the key to being the very same person.
你不必下结论说,只有拥有同样的灵魂,才能成为同一个人。
-
We need to believe that the soul, unlike an engine, can't itself be destroyed, can't itself decompose, can't fall apart.
我们需要相信的是，灵魂和发动机不同，自己不会毁灭，自己不会腐烂，自己不会变成碎片。
-
So don't we need there to be something outside the body that programs the body? That could be the soul.
所以我们是不是也需要肉体的外部程序,来操控自身呢,那可能就是灵魂了
-
It might be that Plato is worried that he hasn't really shown that the soul is immortal afterwards.
可能是柏拉图担心,他并没真正解释,灵魂在死后是不朽的。
-
Not the soul can't be destroyed or if it can be destroyed, it is very very hard and takes very very long time.
而不是灵魂不会毁灭，或者,如果可以毁灭，毁灭会很难,需要很长时间。
-
It's important to realize--as you read the dialogue, it becomes fairly apparent-- that there isn't so much any defense of the belief in the soul.
值得注意的是,当你们读这篇对话时,会发现里面并没有,多少篇幅很明显地,论证灵魂的存在
-
Well--since I myself don't believe in souls, it's hard to surprise you to learn that I don't think the soul theory of personal identity is right.
因为我本身不相信灵魂的存在，所以你们肯定能想到,我认为人格同一性的灵魂论,不是正确的。
-
I simply want to point out enough about the problem to help you see why I don't think free will is a slam-dunk for the soul.
我只是想尽可能地,把这个问题提出来,以帮助你们认识到,为什么我不认同自由意志是灵魂的制胜利器
-
And if the best the soul theorist can say is, "I can't explain it and neither can you," that's not a reason to believe this side.
如果灵魂理论者最多只能说,我不能解释,你也不能,这不是一个相信灵魂存在的理由
-
Suppose the soul theorist answers that last objection by saying,Ain't ever going to happen.
假设灵魂理论者对上个异议的答案是,这事情根本不可能发生。
-
Because I think positing a soul doesn't really yet offer us the explanation.
因为我认为灵魂存在的假设并未,给予我们一个合理的解释
-
Say, "Shelly, I didn't really understand what you were saying about the soul.
你就说，薛立，我真的不明白,你所说的关于灵魂。
应用推荐