This answer that says I just undercut Pepsi, that's true provided that Pepsi hasn't gone above the monopoly price.

比百事定价低点的答案,只有在百事没有高于,垄断价格时才是正确的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The outcome we believe I think, is that imperfect competition should look something between monopoly and perfect competition, it shouldn't look like perfect competition.

这个可信的结果是,不完全竞争应该是介于,垄断和完全竞争之间,而不是与完全竞争相似

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

However, then I'll have the whole market, it's as if I'm a monopolist but suddenly I'm pricing above the monopoly price, that can't be right.

但是,占有整个市场,相当于我是个垄断企业,但是我的价格却高于垄断价格,那是不正确的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So if Pepsi is dumb enough to price above monopoly, sure I will undercut Pepsi but I won't undercut Pepsi by a penny, I'll undercut Pepsi all the way down to the monopoly price and make monopoly profits.

如果百事笨到把价格设的高于垄断价格,我当然要定价比百事低,但不是低一点,我要把价格设得比百事低直至垄断价格,并获取垄断收益

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So if the firms wanted to make more money, the only thing they could do is they could sign an agreement saying, why don't each of us produce not our Cournot quantity, but produce half monopoly profits.

所以如果你们想多赚钱,唯一能做的就是签协议,我们不要按古诺产量生产了,各自生产垄断利润的一半多好呢

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选