OK. What happens if you actually have something that's both syntactically correct, and appears to have correct static semantics, and you run it?

好，当你的代码语法,没错误，并且也有正确的静态语义，你去运行它的时候会发生什么呢？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

And so with these basic building blocks, can you build up much more interesting things and they don't have to be static animations like this.

通过使用这些基础构建模块,你就可以迅速创造出更多有趣的东西,没必要像这个动画一样呆板。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Levels of happiness are essentially static; and anxiety levels and depression levels, as we talked about in the first class have gone up significantly.

幸福水平几乎是静止的;,焦虑水平和抑郁水平，正如第一堂课讲到的，有明显的加深。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

What's the point? Again, you can have things that are syntactically legal but not semantically meaningful, and static semantics is going to be a way of helping us decide what expressions, what pieces of code, actually have real meaning to it. All right?

重点是什么？重申，你可以有东西在语义结构的逻辑上有意义,但是在语义上无意义，而static语义,将是一个帮助我们,决定哪些表达，哪部分的代码实际上，有意义的途径，好么？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选