• She is sorting through masses of dried green moss.

    VOA: standard.2009.12.30

  • So I've done sorting of the left half.

    已对左边排序。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • It's sorting things based on the light frequencies, but it doesn't have the experience of seeing red.

    它只是根据光频来分辨颜色而已,并没有看见红色的体验

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • He says the process of sorting through those areas, which include sites around the country,but concentrated in the mountainous northern areas, will be a long and difficult one, though it is work that needs to be done in the name of the victims' families.

    VOA: standard.2009.12.18

  • Selection sort too really reduces to a total number of comparisons because I'm again comparing the current smallest to the next thing I see, the next thing, so really a lot of these sorting algorithms boil down to comparisons and the numbers that you actually have to make.

    选择排序也可归纳为总数的比较,因为要将当前最小者与下一个进行比较,接着再下一个,可见,很多排序算法都可归结为比较,以及需要比较的次数。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • OK. What's this thing doing then, in terms of sorting?

    这是在做什么呢?排序么?,在第一遍结束的时候?

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • And the context of sorting, the worst case is your handed a problem that's in complete reverse order because that implies you have - to do as more work that could possibly-- that you could-- you have to do more work than you would of course if things were in perfect order.

    在排序的环境中,最糟糕的情况是待排序的序列是,完全逆序的,在这种情况下,你不得不做更多的工作-,比起一个较理想顺序的序列,你必须花费更多的努力。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • OK. Having said that, let's look at doing some sorts. And I'm going to start with a couple of dumb sorting mechanisms. Actually, that's the wrong way saying it, they're simply brain-damaged, they're not dumb, OK?

    我们来做些排序吧,我要开始处理一些愚蠢的排序机制,事实上,我说的不正确,他们就是没脑子,不是笨,发明出来后,他们就在不停的被挑战?

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • OK. Could we do better in terms of sorting?

    我们在排序上可能做的更好么?

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • I'm done sorting a list of size 2.

    现在我已将这2杯排好序了。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • So supposed that I give you 16 elements to sort, well, following the logic before, the running time involved in sorting 16 elements is gonna be twice the running time 16 of sorting 8 elements, left half and right half plus 16 - and again, a little sanity check, 16 means-- just the merge steps, right?

    现在要对16个元素进行排序,根据之前的逻辑,对16个元素排序,要花的时间是对8个元素排序所花时间的,2倍,分别用于左半部分和右半部分,再加上6,这里16是-,做合并的步数,对吗?

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • So I propose this as a new algorithm for sorting N elements and being 8 in this case or really a thousand in the case of the phonebook, or anything of larger size.

    所以我提出一种新的算法,来解决N个元素的排序问题,在这个问题中N是8,在电话簿的问题中N是一千,或者是大规模的任何问题。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • If I'm using algorithm that I'm now calling merge sort, T the running time involved in sorting N elements, T of N, you know, is just the same as running the algorithm for the right half, plus what's this plus N come from?

    如果我用归并排序算法,对N个元素其运行时间,就等于此算法一半元素的运行时间,另一半的运行时间,再加上N,这个N是什么呢?

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定