Some of you have actually had the privilege of having these errors already, for different reasons.

你们中有人有出现过,这些错误，因为不同的原因。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

I mean it's pretty easy to measure errors in some cases.

有些类型的误差是很容易测量的

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

as long as it's small and finite, will lead to some small infinite errors in the formula, but remember it's got to be in the end made to be vanishingly small.

只要它只是有限小,就会在公式中引起无限小的误差,但请记住,Δt最后变得难以察觉地小

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

Here are some of the errors.

以下是一些误差

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

Now this was nineteen-eighty-two, quite a long time ago, at a time when people really weren't paying much attention to calories like they are now, so you'd expect the errors to decline as time goes on and there's some evidence of that, but they're errors nonetheless.

这是1982年的实验,很早之前了,当时的人们并不像今天的人们一样,那么关注卡路里,所以你会预计误差会随时间推移而减小,有证据证明了这一点,但误差仍然存在

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

Of course that depends on the accuracy of the self- reports that people are making on their own, and as you'll see in just a minute, there are errors in that and some of you may have experienced some of that yourself in keeping the dietary records.

当然这还取决于每个人自己完成的,个体调查的准确性,正如你马上会看到的,这其中有误差,而你们也可能经历过一些,你自己保存膳食记录时的误差

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选