Now in a few minutes I will turn to the question What about Socrates' criticisms of the analogy?

一会儿我要讲,苏格拉底对此类比的批评怎么样？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

There is obviously no magic solution to this question but the best answer I know of is Socrates.

这个问题,没有神奇的解答,但我认为最佳的答案是苏格拉底。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Socrates instead spends some time worrying about the question: is the soul really like harmony or not?

取而代之的是花时间,研究一个问题：,即灵魂是不是真的像和声一样？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

It's a question that lingers and one might wonder whether Socrates ever successfully answers that question.

这是萦回不散的问题,有人可能要问,苏格拉底是否曾成功地,响应那个问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

This is in many ways for Socrates the fundamental political question of all times.

这在很多层面上对苏格拉底,都是基本的恒时政治问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

So the question is: "? "What does Socrates care about"?

所以，问题就是：,“苏格拉底关心什么？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

This always raises the question that you will discuss in your section, whether or not Socrates' censorship of poetry and the arts is an indication of his totalitarian impulses.

这一向会唤出,你们在讨论时间会遇到的问题，苏格拉底对诗学与艺术的审查,是否点出,他的极权念头。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

It is this Socrates who is brought up on charges of corruption and impiety yet none of this quite answers the question of what is the nature of Socrates' crime.

这是被控腐化,与亵渎神明的苏格拉底,但这都未能完整地回答,苏格拉底所背罪名的本质究竟为何。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Now, in the course of this discussion, Socrates and his disciples argue about not so much the existence of the soul, but the question really is the immortality of the soul.

在这段谈话中,苏格拉底和他的学生们,讨论的主要不是灵魂存在的问题,而是灵魂不朽的问题

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

The question is, why does Socrates exhibit such proud defiance and independence of the laws in the Apology, and such total, even kind of mouse-like, acquiescence to the laws in the Crito?

问题是，为何苏格拉底一方面展现了自豪的反抗,及独立于法律之外如同《自辩篇》所载，但这种绝对性，却化为鼠辈般，默认了全部的法律，一如《克里托篇》所载？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

But it gets back to the question, are the reasons Socrates gives Crito for refusing to escape, the reasons he puts in the mouth of the laws of the city of Athens, ? are those Socrates' true reasons?

但这带回到那个问题，到底苏格拉底给克里托,拒绝越狱的理由，他以雅典城邦法律立场,所说的理由，是苏格拉底真正的理由吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

So this is a question that I want to continue today, to consider what the trial of Socrates means and I want to begin by going back to a problem or a paradox that I ended the class with last time.

这就是我今天要继续的问题，考虑苏格拉底受审的意义,我想要先回到一个问题,一个悖论,也是我们上堂课所遗留的。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

The question is why does Socrates regard philosophic kingship as required for Kallipolis, ? for the just city?

问题是,为何苏格拉底认为哲学式王权,对，Kallipolis，是必备的，对这座正义之城？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选