It's just really the same argument coming in the other direction.

和刚才原理是相同的,就是方向相反

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

When Milton opens Lycidas with that phrase, "Yet once more," one of the things that he's telling the reader is that ; yet once more he'll be making the same argument for unreadiness; the same argument for nervous anticipation that he'd made a number of times before.

当弥尔顿用那句“然而再一次的“开始的篇章时“,他要告诉读者的是,他会再一次的对诗中的迟疑作出相同的论述;,和他之前无数次作出的,关于不安的预知的，一成不变的论述。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

In other words, it's not a completely supercilious argument, sort of "God is brought into being the same way objects that we make use of are brought into being."

换句话说，这并不完全是一个目空一切的论点，他认为，上帝形成的方式,与我们所用之物形成的方式是一样的“

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Just for sake of argument, we'll assume it's about there, and I do the same thing.

为了方便起见,我们假定就在这里，重复之前做的。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选