The message I'm trying to get to here, because I'm running you right up against time, is I have to be careful about what's a primitive step.
我想说的事情是,因为我正在跟大家讲算法时间复杂度,我们需要注意一个基本步骤的定义,如果我可以假设。
It has lots of, it is right up against the Hudson River and there are lots of playgrounds for little kids
它面向哈德逊河,也有许多可供小孩儿嬉戏玩耍的游乐设施。
All of you chose Down, but Up does best against Left and Middle does best against Right.
你们都选择下,可是选上是左的最佳对策,而选中是右的最佳对策
Probability is 0 of their choosing Right is the same as saying they choose Left, so that my payoff from Up against that is given by the top box up there, I get 5.
如果对手选右的概率是0,其实就是说他们会选左,因此此情况下我选上的收益,从上面的矩阵看,我的收益是5
Similarly, we can see that Right is not dominated, because it does better against Up, than does Left.
类似的,我们也得出右也不是劣势策略,因为参与人I选上时,选右比选左好
So, for example, you might think Down is dominated, but if we look a bit carefully we see that Down actually does better than Up against Right, and Down does better than Middle against Left.
例如说,你们可能认为选下是个劣势策略,但仔细观察后你会发现,参与人II选右时,选下要比上更好,参与人II选左,选下比选中更好
应用推荐