"Do you see that there may be a problem with Prime Minister Maliki putting on the ballot in the upcoming elections a referendum on that precise question?" "I think a referendum would be more possible if there were a perception that we were not living up to the security agreement.
VOA: standard.2009.09.10
This is an interesting question: do they solve the moral hazard and adverse selection problem as well as banks do?
一个有意思的问题出现了,他们可以向银行那样,处理好道德风险以及逆向选择问题吗
How many" is very simple. You will have no problem with this question.
How many”的用法也非常简单。相信你不会遇到太大的问题的。
I have one question on the problem set that asks you to think about how you would handle a decision.
习题册中有这样一道问题,你们将如何做出决策
In fact there's research-- for example, this was done with internists, doctors, who are giving a very difficult, very difficult question connected to a liver problem that an individual patient had.
实际上有这样一项研究-,在内科医生,医生中间进行,向他们提出一个,与肝脏问题有关的很困难的问题,那是一个病人的病症。
Sometimes they're not even aware that that's what they're doing, and I want you to understand that on those occasions I'll most likely respond by inviting you to consider the article of faith that lies behind that question and is creating that particular problem for you.
有时甚至他们自己都不会意识到,我想要你们知道通常在那样的情况下,我的回应会是,请你弄清那个问题背后的信条是什么,及让你明白正是那个信条在给你制造这问题。
But there was an increase in discretionary spending And that's the problem, no question about that. -No The republicans sidled up to the troff... and it behaved like porkers Is that roughly what happened? -Yes.
话说回来,当时自由支出确实增长不少,这才是症结所在,这一点毫无疑问,-对吧,共和党一步一步放宽了尺度。,结果导致负债累累,大致原委是这样吧?,-没错。
But since we are only looking at enough of the problem of identity to get to the question that we really want to think about, the nature of personal identity across time, I'm not going to pursue that.
但由于我们只是,通过质的问题,来讨论,我们真正关注的问题,也就是贯穿时间的人格同一性,所以我不讨论那些。
The second question I want to ask is what's the base case? When do I get down to a problem that's small enough that it's basically trivial to solve? Here it was lists of size one. I could have stopped at lists of size two right. That's an easy comparison.
第二个问题是什么是基础条件?,我要将问题分解到何时才使得问题,小到可以解决的基本问题?,这里是当列表的长度为1有时候,我也可以在长度为2的时候停止分解,那是一个非常简单的对比。
Piaget was really big into question and answer, but one problem with this is that children aren't very good with language, and this might lead you to underestimate how much they know.
皮亚杰非常热衷用问与答的方法进行研究,但这里存在的一个问题便是,儿童并未能完全掌握语言,这可能会导致你低估他们的理解能力
You could use a "who" question to find out where the problem began.
你可以用“who”问句来找出问题从哪里开始。
Now that's not a problem for the body view, because on the body view, the question is "it's the same body."
这对于肉体论而言并不是个问题,因为肉体论,只看重,是否是同样的肉体“
You're going to get these personality tests all the time and the personality tests-- You're applying for a business and " one of the tests says "I like to steal from my bosses " Well, I don't think so No That's a little IQ test right there ? So, the question is how do you avoid that problem?
你们以后会做很多这样的性格测试,例如:你求职时做性格测试,其中一题是“我想偷老板的东西“,不,我不会,这相当于一个智商测试,问题在于,你怎么避免那个问题?
应用推荐