People enjoy that in ways that Iser may not be fully acknowledging in this argument, but there's no question that it doesn't involve the violation of expectations.

人们很开心地看到，从某种程度上伊瑟尔可能,没有在他的论点中完全承认，但是毫无疑问,论点中并没有期望的违背。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Our question is not was Plato overlooking something he should have thought of, is does this argument work or not.

我们的问题不是柏拉图忽略了,一些他本该想到的事情，而是这个论证说不说得通。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

He makes a perfectly plausible argument to the effect that the question is grammatical rather than rhetorical.

他提出了一个貌似非常可信的论据,大意是说这个问句是语法型的，而不是修辞型的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Sort of the original argument that I made in the very first question you asked.

正如我对第一个问题的回答。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

But at any rate, our question shouldn't be what was Plato thinking, but is the argument any good.

总之，我们的问题不该是,柏拉图在想什么，而是这个论证好不好。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

All right. So the next question is, is the argument from recollection a good one?

那么下一个问题是,回忆论是否是无懈可击的呢

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Still, that doesn't mean that we should believe the argument for the existence of the soul from near-death experiences, because the question remains, "What's the best explanation of what's going on in near-death experiences?"

但是,这并不意味着,我们应该相信那些从濒死体验角度,来证明灵魂存在的论证,因为问题仍在,对于濒死体验的,最好解释是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选