French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said the signals about the Iranian position on the deal are not so positive and that could negatively affect the upcoming P5+1 meeting in Geneva.

VOA: standard.2009.10.24

So he says that position 1, strategy 1, choosing the most extreme left wing position is a dominated strategy.

他说到立场1,也就是策略1,即选择最极端的左翼立场,是劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

I get all the voters right on top of me at position 1 and she gets everyone else, is that right?

我得到选择立场1的10%选票,对手得到剩余90%的选票,对吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

I'm going to get all the people at position 1 and half the people at position 2 for a total of 15.

我会获得所有立场1的选票,和立场2一半的选票,就是15%

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

It means that choosing position 2 always gives me a higher share of the vote than choosing position 1, no matter where the other candidate positions herself.

意味着选择立场2,会比选择立场1,获得更多的选票,无论另一个候选人如何选择

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So, in particular, let's start working out what share of the votes you'd get if you chose position 1 or position 2, against different positions the other guy can choose.

先来看看如果你选择立场1和2,在你对手选择不同立场时,你分别能获得多少选票

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So suppose the other candidate has chosen position 1.

假设另一个候选人选择立场1

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

In particular, if the other candidate were to choose position 1, I would get a higher share of the vote choosing 2 than I would have done if I had chosen 3.

如果对手选择立场1,我选立场2会比选立场3,得到更多的票数

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So the other candidate has chosen position 1.

另一个候选人选择立场1

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So whatever 1/17th of a $1, roughly $.05 for each position away.

不论1美元的1/17是多少,大概是每个位置价值5美分

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We're just saying we want What we're saying is, we know that the candidates aren't going to position themselves at 1 and aren't going to position themselves at 10.

我们只是想,我们要说的是,我们知道候选人,不会选择立场1,同样也不会选择立场10

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选