I think the real point is that because we are in uncharted waters, the argument can always be made back to the Obama administration there is not a clear blueprint.

VOA: standard.2009.03.29

All I'm saying is that if someday we found that, at that point,we'd have an argument for the soul.

我要说的是，如果有一日我们发现这种情况，那时候才会有灵魂存在的论据。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But still, let me quickly point out why you could resist the argument from free will to the existence of a soul.

但我还是要简短地指出,为什么你们会拒不认同,从自由意志的角度来论证灵魂的存在

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

This says, I need a second argument to it, and that second argument better be a point so I can do the comparison.

这里我需要第二个参数，第二个参数最好是一个点,这样我就能做比较了。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

So this is an 'in shoes', be careful where we are here, this is an 'in shoes in shoes' argument, at which point you might want to invent the sock.

所以这是一个不断换位思考式的过程,注意一下这里的措辞,这是一个换位再换位思考的过程,说明我们也要换来换去思考

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If you look at the argument the poor need the money more, at no point in that argument do you contradict the fact that we've extrapolated from, agreed upon principles that people own themselves.

如果你仔细想想穷人更需要钱这个论据，该论据没有任何论点,能反驳我们已经推定的事实，即已达成共识的，人人自主原则。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

The ostensible purpose of this sentence at this point, as I take it, in Milton's argument is to explain the importance of censorship; but surely this sentence has an entirely different effect on us as readers, a different effect than the syntax or the logic of this sentence may demand.

这句话表面上的目的，我认为，是在弥尔顿的论点里解释控制的重要性,但是这个句子却对读者产生了相反的作用，一个和这句话的句式逻辑的要求,不同的影响。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

self First argument by convention is always self, because it has to point to the instance, and then I pass, in this case, another couple of arguments in.

第一个参数往往是，因为它必须指向实例，然后我传入了，在这个例子中。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

But at this point, the person making the argument has a possible response.

但在这点上，提出争论的人就有可能这样回应。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Now I look at that element. Is it the thing I'm looking for? If I'm really lucky, it is. If not, I look at the value of that point here and the thing I'm looking for. And for sake of argument let's assume that the thing I'm looking for is smaller than the value here.

现在我们瞧瞧指向的元素,它是我们找的值么？如果足够幸运，他就是，如果不是,我们比较指向的元素,同我们要找的元素，方便起见,假设要找的元素比这里的值要小。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

But very nicely, is quite elegent structure this point, Socrates puts toghther the two arguments that we just been rehearsing, the argument from recollection and the argument that came before that, the one that I dubbed the argument from recycling.

但是这一观点的结构非常精妙,苏格拉底把我们刚才演练的,两个论证放在一块，即源于记忆的论证,和在此之前的论证，就是被我称作源于轮回的论证。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So the flaw in the argument that Chris and Ryan had -- it isn't a bad argument, it's a good starting point but the flaw in the argument, the mistake in the argument was the first sentence in the argument.

所以克里斯和瑞恩的说法的漏洞在于,这并不是一个错误的说法,这是一个很好的出发点,但其中存在漏洞,其中的漏洞在于第一句话

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选