When you want a point particle, if you wake up and find a point particle on your bed, what's your reaction?
当你想要一个质点,想当你醒来时发现一个质点在你的床上,你是什么反应
You want to get the contract for Johnny Fontaine, you don't tell your consiglieri, "Hey Tom, put a point particle on Jack's bed."
约翰尼·方丹为电影《教父》中的角色,影片中有杀马恐吓的情节
So up to this point, before it was really established that yes, light is like a particle sometimes, there was this very strong distinction between what is light and what is matter.
所以关于这个观点,在它被真正确立之前,光有时候像粒子,在什么是光和什么是物质之间,有一个非常巨大的区别。
There's a picture of a horse, a picture of the carriage, all glossy stuff. Then it says, "Treat the horse as a point particle."
这有一幅马的图片,一幅车厢的图片,画得很漂亮,然后告诉你,"把马看做一个质点"
But nowadays, it's a horse, but in the end, if you're going to treat it as a point particle, it seems to me to be a real waste.
但是如今,一匹马,到最后,如果你仅把它当做一个质点来看,对我来说似乎是有点太浪费了
At least there, the fact is not a point particle is important.
至少在那个时候,它不是质点才是最重要的
As time increases, the angle increases and we can ask, "How long does it take for the particle to come back to the starting point?"
这个角度随着时间在增加,我们会问,"质点需要多长时间,才能转到起点"
So what I've said so far is, a particle moving in time from point to point can be represented by a graph, x versus t.
到目前为止,我说过,一个质点随时间的连续运动,可以用一幅x-t图来表示
应用推荐