So you're basically having a wave equation for a particle, and for our purposes we're talking about a very particular particle. What we're interested in is the electron.
所以你们主要有,一个粒子的波动方程,我们的目的是考虑一个特殊的粒子,我们感兴趣的是电子。
That view's also worth taking seriously in a metaphysics class, but for our purposes, I mention it and put it aside.
此观点也值得在哲学课程中认真讨论,但就我们的目标而言,我仅仅只是提及它,并将其搁置一边
Well, for our purposes, both are correct and we'll know how to figure this out on tests.
这个,对课堂而言,两种都正确,我们会在测试中明白原因的
Essentially for our purposes here, you can just think of it as a conversion factor.
就是去掉库伦标签,这就是我们。
Not a very useful one for our purposes in this class here.
然而它不太适合我们,的教学。
Now, I suppose the most important aspect of all of this for our purposes are the results of all of this, and they were tremendous.
现在,我想对我们结论有帮助的,最重要的就是,所有的成果,它们是十分了不起的
I'm using, here, antigen interchangeably with vaccine for our purposes today.
在这里,我使用可以,与疫苗相互作用的抗原来介绍今天的问题
We'll say a little bit about Beyond the Pleasure Principle, ; which is the crucial text for our purposes; but plainly apart from the influence of and the ideas borrowed from Freud, you'll find Brooks writing on what for you is pretty familiar turf.
我想花一点点时间说说《超越快乐原则》,这篇文章对于我们今天理解主题至关重要;,但是如果不看从弗洛伊德那里借来的思想和影响外,布鲁克斯所写的对于你们来说应该会很熟悉。
You can brute force it and unfortunately, the so-called Caesar cipher is not very secure because if you assume, for our purposes in English alphabet with 26 characters, say all lowercase for all uppercase, my God, you only have to try like 24, 25, 26 possible rotations until you can figure out what his secret message is.
你可以强行解密但是不幸地是,所谓的凯撒密码不是很安全的,因为如果假设,对于我们的26个字符的字母表,指明所有的小写为大写,我的天,你只要试24,25次,26次就可以解答出,密文的内容。
So historians can and in fact have many times taken issue with a lot of Weber's historical claims. But he's invaluable, as the critic John Guillory has argued, for our purposes in the understanding of Milton and of a lot of the cultural business of the seventeenth century in general.
所以历史学家可以,事实上已经对韦伯的历史学断言,持反对意见,但就像评论家约翰古月里说的,对我们来说,在对弥尔顿以及很多,17世纪文化方面的事的了解上,他的意见是非常宝贵的。
In American history our reform crusades have usually had to do with one of several objects or purposes or problems.
在美国历史上我们为理想而进行的改革,通常与如下几个目的,或意图,或者问题之一有关联
But they're, I think, the two most prominent positions and definitely the ones most worth taking seriously for our purposes.
但我想,它们是,两个最突出的观点,并且绝对是,在我们解答问题上值得严肃对待的观点
The crucial premise since we're giving Plato number one the crucial premise for our purposes is premise number two.
最关键的前提是,我们已经承认了前提一,所以对我们来说最关键的前提是前提二
You might put it this way as sort of the easiest version of this kind of argument, for our purposes.
你也可以把它当作,这种论证的最简解释方式,以便于理解
For our purposes, I think that won't be crucial, and so I'll sometimes talk about this set of abilities without actually having a canonical list.
但鉴于课程的目的,这点并不在我们的讨论重点之内,所以我也许偶尔会提及人的这些能力,但并不会把它们详尽地列举出来
I'll say, "Plato holds" Or "Socrates argues," because for our purposes it's all the same.
我会说,"柏拉图认为"或者"苏格拉底认为",因为就这门课的目的而言两种说法是等效的
For our purposes,the crucial point is to see that what seems to be going on there is our hero is taking the place of somebody else who's about to die.
我们的目的是搞清楚这里的情况,我们的主人公代替别人死亡了。
But for our purposes, I think it's not a contender.
但就我们的目标而言,它与我们讨论的话题并不相关
For our purposes, I think it's not crucial.
就我们的论题来讲,我觉得这些都无关紧要
For our purposes, it won't really matter.
就我们这门课程的目的而言,这都无关紧要
Well,for our purposes,the romance isn't crucial.
这里爱情罗曼史不是关键的。
So for our purposes, we don't have to ask ourselves when Socrates in the dialogue says something, is this a view that the dead man Socrates actually would have held or is this simply a view that the dead man Plato put in the mouth of the character Socrates?
所以,出于这门课程的目的,我们无需深究,苏格拉底在对话中的某个观点,到底是属于那个真实的受死之人苏格拉底的,还是属于已故之人柏拉图,通过作品中苏格拉底这个角色所表述的
What's important for our immediate purposes is her identification of Milton as a cultural authority.
这里重要的,我想引起你们注意的是,恰德莱将弥尔顿定位为一个文化权威。
I also want to assume for our present purposes that there's only pressure volume work going on, which is to say I want to put pdV p dV in here minus p dV for dw.
同时假定,对于我们目前的目的而言,只有压强做功这就是说,我要把这里的dw替换为负。
So for our purposes, let's suppose Plato was right about that and ask, what follows?
所以为了我们的目的,让我们假设柏拉图是对的,然后呢
But for our purposes, we don't really need to worry about the details.
但就我们的目的而言,我们不需要,担心种种细节。
But again for all our purposes, we don't have to go there.
但就我们的目的而言,我们不需要讨论这个。
For our purposes, I think it doesn't really matter.
就我们论题来讲,我觉得这无关紧要
应用推荐