Davis said Congress had no right to destroy or limit this right.

VOA: special.2009.03.26

Right? That would be an entirely different matter, wouldn't it, because you would have absolutely no idea whether the question was rhetorical or grammatical, right?

对吧，那将会是一个完全不同的情况，难道不是吗，因为你就会完全不知道,这个问句是修辞型的还是语法型的，对吧？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Now, I put a version up there, I have no idea if this is the right way to do comparisons or not.

现在，我把一个版本放在这里了，我不知道这是不是,做比较的正确方法。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

"No previous pandemic has been detected so early or watched so closely, in real-time, right at the very beginning."

VOA: standard.2009.12.25

Right. You were saying that still we were not seeing enoough personnel or enough... No, we not.

是的，您刚才还提到，我们仍然缺少人员。,不，不是的。

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

No, that's all right, ma'am. I was showing hima thing or two on the guitar.

VOA: standard.other

There's no Geiger counter to tell you number 3 is nearby or someting, right?

没有盖革计数器来告诉你,数字3就在你附近，对吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Is that right? What is that? What? Yes or no? Yes.

这种看法对不对,是不是呢,是的

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

Natural right is mutable because different circumstances will require different kinds of decisions. So does this mean then that for Aristotle there are no universally valid ? standards of justice or right?

自然权利是易变的，因为不同的情况,将需要不同种的决策,这是否就意谓着亚里士多德,认为没有寰宇合法的,正义与权利标准？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Is that right or are you saying no?

对吗,还是不对

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Why? Because the labor is the unquestionable property of the laborer " and therefore, no one but the laborer can have a right to what is joined to or mixed with his labor.

为什么，因为劳动是劳动者无可争议的所有物,《政府论》第五章，“论财产“,因此除这名劳动者以外,对他施加或掺进劳动的所有物，别人没有所有权。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

In C and most programming languages, if you need greater than or equal to, use greater than and then right next to it with no space put equal to, and that conjures up the same idea.

在C和大部分的编程语言中，如果你需要表示大于等于,在“>“号后边加上一个“=“,中间不要空格，那使我们联想到同样的想法。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

How do I give up my right to do whatever is in my power to secure my person or my possessions, when I have no expectation, you might say, ? that others around me are prepared to do so as well?

我怎么能在我不期望,身边的人会这样做的时候，放弃我保护自身和财产安全，不受侵害的权利？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Or,is Williams right,that no,even in principle go as fantastic and science fictiony as you want ? in principle an immortal life could not be desirable?

或者Williams是否说得对？，即使原则上,你可以尽情想象无尽的美好和科幻,原则上永生并不令人向往？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选