I know that if the second mass moved faster than the first one, then the picture is completely wrong.
因为我知道如果第二个物体比第一个运动更快,那么受力图就肯定不是这样了
It's just something is wrong: ?" one minute you are envious and the next minute you experience love?"
事情不对劲:,前一分钟充满嫉妒,转眼体会无尽爱意“
It would definitely be wrong if we were doing this because little sanity check if you just got the single one it means what instead?
如果我们这样做就是错误的,一个小检查,如果你用单个“=“,是什么意思?
But that's the only one he's going to lose because you were defending the wrong pass.
但是他只会损失一个营,因为你选择了在错误的途径设防
They're inside that loop-I've got the wrong glasses so I'm going to have to squint- and we've got one test which is a comparison we've got another test which is a multiplication-- sorry, not a test, we've got - another step which is a multiplication- and another step that is a subtraction.
他们在循环里面呢,我带错眼镜了所以不得不斜视-,然后我们这里有一个比较的测试,还有一个乘法的测试,-对不起,不是测试,是另外一个乘法的步骤-,还有一个减法的步骤。
One way you could reject a theory is that it could be wrong.
一种情况是,理论本身就是存在错误的。
Leviticus 19:33-34: "When a stranger resides with you in your land, you shall not wrong him. The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as one of your citizens; you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I, the Lord, am your God."
利未记》第19章33-34节的记录如下,若有外人在你们国中,和你同居,就不可欺负他,和你们同居的外人,你们要看他如本地人一样,并要爱他如己,因为你们,在埃及地也作过寄居的,我是耶和华你们的上帝“
Every child, every one of you, every one of us was brought up to know that one must never do wrong, even if good consequences are seen to follow.
每一个小孩,在座的各位,我们每一个人都从小被教育,不要做坏事,就算结果是善也不行。
I'm sorry, that's not right. I don't want to get this wrong, 25,051, and we learn that in a Cretan village, two nurses, one girl, and one boy are employed.
对不起,不对,我不是有意犯错,两万五千零五十一头,我们了解到在一个克里特的村子,两名护士,一个女孩和一个男孩被雇佣了
For example, one thing that could happen is that you build it up with wood and clay, you pick the wrong material for a bridge, and it will not stand up to the forces of nature.
例如,其中的一个问题是,选择了木头和粘土作为造桥的材料,你就选错了材料,这座桥难以与自然力相抗衡
So, the Commune begins on the 18th of March, 1871, and it lasts until the end of May, 1871. Lenin once called it the "Festival of the Oppressed"; and Lenin was wrong about many things, he was right about a few things but wrong about many, but he got that one right.
由此,巴黎公社在一八七一年三月十八日成立,并于同年的五月底被政府所瓦解,列宁将这段时间称为"受压迫者的庆典",列宁做错过不少事情,他做对的事情寥寥无几,但对于巴黎公社的评价是正确的
So one thing that's missing, or wrong if you like, but the one thing is the voters are not evenly distributed in the real world.
被忽视的因素,或者说错误在于,在现实生活中,每个立场的选民数并非是均分的
I'm going to go there initially, so I can move this over here, so I can get the base part of that over there, I want to put that one there before I put this over here, finally I get to the point where I can move the bottom one over now I've got to be really careful to make sure that I don't cover up the bottom one in the wrong way before I get to the stage where I wish they were posts and there you go.
我要先把其他的放到多余的柱子上,然后把最底下的放到目标柱子上,我要在把除了最底下的圆盘,其他的圆盘挪过来之前,把最下面的圆盘放在这儿,因此我得出了最下面的盘子,应该如何摆放的结论,当我没得到其他盘子的正确摆放位置的时候,要很小心的确认没把错误的盘子,放在最下面的盘子上面。
It just turns out to be wrong but another way-- And so one way to attack and address a scientific theory is to view it as just to see whether or not it works.
但最终被证明是错误的-,评判一个理论,是否属于科学理论的另一种情况,就是看它是否成功的进行了预测。
They're two water companies, so they're Poland Spring and Coca-Cola I guess these days, sign this agreement saying that each one's going to produce half monopoly quantity and what's going to go wrong with that agreement?
有两家瓶装水公司,比如说波兰泉和可口可乐,他们签署了协议规定,每家都只生产垄断产量的一半,这个协议有什么问题吗
Well, one thing that goes wrong is that suppose Coke and Pepsi were able to either to write a contract or whatever to sustain joint monopoly output at this high price, this price which is actually producing positive profits in the industry it is going to turn out, therefore the price is going to be above costs.
我来说吧,问题出在这里了,假设可口可乐和百事达成了协议,不管签的是协议还是合同,只要能通过协约维持垄断产出,通过制定高价来达到正的利润就行,这样价格是高于成本的
Another way of saying that, stop me if this is wrong, but one way to say that is we've been assuming that politics is one dimensional, left/right and there might be other things involved: character or even among issues, even among political issues it could be more than one dimension.
换句话说就是,如果我说错了请纠正,换种说法就是,我们把政治假定为单一维度的,非左即右,然而它还涉及其他方面,比如性格问题,即使政治事务的处理也不是单一维度的
And so one can ask, "? "Is Thrasymachus wrong to believe this?"
我们因此要提问,“Thrasymachus,这么相信错了吗“
应用推荐