Ever since this was first proposed, there has never been any observations that do not coincide with the idea, that did not match the fact that the probability density is equal to the wave function squared.
从未有,任何观测,与它相抵触,从没有过,波函数的平方不等于,概率密度的情况,关于马克思,波恩。
They're not interacting at all so that's why the energy is the same as that for two individual atoms, that's what we're dealing with. As we get closer together, we start get lower and lower in energy.
它们之间没有任何相互作用,因此,体系的能量就等于两个分开的原子的能量,这就是我们要处理的,而随着我们的距离越来越近,我们的能量开始变得越来越低。
Maybe not. It has no protons, so therefore, it has no electrons Because proton number equals electron number, which means if it has no protons 0 its atomic number is zero.
也可能不会,这个元素没有质子,因此,也没有电子,因为质子数等于电子数,意味着它没有质子,它的原子序数为。
p1 I said let's do this slowly enough that this p1 is in equilibrium with this p1, but not so slowly that this pressure is equivalent to that pressure.
我曾说过我们足够慢地使这边的1,与这边的p1平衡,但是没有慢到,这里的压强等于这里的压强。
When I was not accelerating and everything was at rest, ma was 0, w was mg, and w was the reading on the needle.
当我还没有加速,一切静止的时候,ma 是 0,w 就等于 mg,w 就是指针的读数
Angular nodes, we're not going to have any of those, we'll have zero, l equals 0, so we have zero angular nodes.
角向节点,当然,是没有的,0个,l等于0,所以是0个角向节点。
When we look at this angular part, we see that it's always the square root of 1 over 4 pi, it doesn't matter what the angle is, it's not dependent on the angle.
当我们看这角向部分,可以看到它总是等于1除以4pai开根号,这和是什么角度没有关系,它和角度无关。
应用推荐