• So, inside of code, or inside of a script, there's no print, unless we make it explicit.

    因此,在代码里面,或者在脚本里面,不会有显示结果的功能,除非我们让它这么做。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • I'm much better having an exception get handled at the time of input than to let that prop -- that value rather propagate through a whole bunch of code until eventually it hits an error 17 calls later, and you have no clue where it came from.

    不是我期望的格式,这时我最好有一个异常处理,而不是让其传下去,这个值传到代码的整个分支,最终会导致一个错误17调用的发生,并且你不知道这个错误是哪里来的。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Because if I don't specify a name for this input, I have no way of actually referring to it in subsequent lines of code.

    因为如果我不给这个输入定义一个名字,在随后的代码中,我就没有办法使用它。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • Right? If that was the case in that code, then my complexity is no longer log, because I need linear access for each time I've got to go to the list, and it's going to Lisp be much worse than that.

    这里的复杂度不再是对数的了,因为每次在列表中,查找需要线性访问,可能还要糟糕,其实,有些编程语言,如。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • And, in fact, it kind of looks like a function, and yet here's a semicolon I just said that can get you into trouble, and yet that's not actually a function, because there's no interesting lines of code, because it turns out the interesting code is down here at the bottom.

    实际上,它有点像一个函数,并且这里有一个能够使你陷入麻烦当中的分号,那个事实上也不是一个函数,因为这里没有有用的代码,因为,有用的代码都在底端。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • There is no substitute for reading your code.

    没有什么能代替阅读代码。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Because as you'll soon find, when you're writing programs 0 that aren't just four lines long but are 40 or 400 which very quickly becomes easy, you'll find that even you the next morning have no idea what this code does for whatever reason, and just having some English comments is a huge boon to comprehension for yourself and others.

    你们自己写程序时就会发现,用40行甚至400行代码来代替繁杂拥挤的4行代码0,将会让事情简化许多,你会发现,即使由于某些原因,你不知道如何写代码,先写些注释,于人于己,都是好事,易于理解嘛。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • So conceptually the key difference here, besides the syntax looking slightly different, it just means that if you want a chunk of code to execute no matter what initially, ; you can use the do while loop; if you want to check a condition first, you can use the while loop.

    所以概念上,则关键的区别是,除了语法看起来有点不同,它的意思是如果你想要一段代码,最初无论如何都要执行,你就可以用do,while循环;,如果你想要先检查条件,你可以用while循环。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定