In other words, it's not a completely supercilious argument, sort of "God is brought into being the same way objects that we make use of are brought into being."
换句话说,这并不完全是一个目空一切的论点,他认为,上帝形成的方式,与我们所用之物形成的方式是一样的“
And Chomsky's argument is complicated and interesting, but the main sort of argument he had to make is goes like this.
乔姆斯基的论据很复杂,也很有意思,但他所提出的主要论据是这样的。
It's a wonderfully compressed argument in which the Soul and the Heart make competing claims for Christianity and classical and literary wisdom.
这里压缩的争论很精彩,其中心和灵魂关于基督教义和,古典的文学的智慧提出相对立的主张。
The confusion, the mistake I think people are making when they make this argument, the mistake I think they're making is this.
我觉得人们提出这个论点的时候,产生的困惑和错误,我认为他们犯的错如下。
And I think you could win, if you're going on the Hustings, let me add one element to the argument you might make.
我认为,如果你参选,应该可以赢,我给你补充一点,你也许能用上。
But it's all legal and you could make an argument that it's in a general good of our society that people do that.
但是,这些都合法并且你可以驳斥我说,人们这样做,在大体上是,对社会有好处的。
God the Father will make a similar argument in Book Three.
上帝,人类之父会在卷三中做出相似的回应。
I'll show you some other advertisements later that are oriented to men that make that same argument: that if you're a man, nobody is going to tell you what to eat.
我会再给你们看一个广告,也是瞄准男性观众打出了同样的旗号,如果你是个男人,没有人可以左右你该吃些什么
Now, this is what you're going to do in the homework assignment, but I'm just going to make the argument that you could also imagine firms sitting somewhere between 0 and 1.
这是你们需要在家庭作业上完成的内容,值得一提的是,你们也可以想象公司在0和1间任何地方
Polemarchus But Socrates challenges Polemarchus to a group, any group, cannot be a virtue in itself, and he trips Polemarchus up with a very, in many ways, familiar Socratic argument "? "Do we ever make mistakes?"
但苏格拉底仍挑战,对一个团体或任何团体忠诚本身,并不能当作是一种美德,他对付,Polemarchus,的方式,是大家非常熟悉的苏老式辩论,“我们曾犯错吗“
But before we do, I wanna make a last couple of comments about the argument we were considering at the end of last class.
但是在这之前,我想要对上堂课结束之前,我们考虑的那些论证,进行最后的点评。
Well, we need that premise as well to make the argument go.
要论证成立,这也是个必要的前提
There's another argument descartes could have made that's a lot less subtle than the ones he did make, which is "That thing responsible for free will and love and consciousness?
笛卡尔本可以指出一个,比他所举论据,更为巧妙的论据,也就是,"这东西会是引起自由意志,爱恋,与意识的原因吗
Well, I just think that if he was making his own original idea and it was his idea to start with, then that would be the only situation in which I would see it being appropriate in any way because that way you couldn't make the argument that he was pressured, you know it's three-to-one or whatever the ratio was.
我只是认为,如果这就是他的本意,是他主动要求被杀的,只有在这种情况下,我才认为无论从哪方面来说都是恰当的,因为那样的话,就不能说派克是被迫的,毕竟当时是3对1的局面,派克不占优势。
If we could find the right F, and make out the argument, the physicalist can't explain it or does a bad job of explaining it and the dualist does a better job of explaining it, we'd have reason to believe in the soul.
如果我们能找到合适的特性F,并且给出论证,物理主义者无法解释,或者解释得很牵强,而二元论的解释更合理,那么我们就有理由相信有灵魂存在
应用推荐