The right to life,liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
VOA: special.2009.06.11
Suppose the individual right to religious liberty were at stake, then, Alex, you could say, on the Hustings.
假设个人信仰自由的权利,岌岌可危,那么,亚历克斯,你在竞选时可以说。
Surely, you would all agree that we shouldn't put the right to individual liberty up to a vote.
选民们,你们肯定都赞同,不该以投票来决定个人自由。
Nature gave each individual the right to life, liberty, property, and nobody could take these away legitimately.
自然赋予每个个体以,生命权,自由权和财产权,没有人有权力剥夺
So even once the majority is in charge, the majority can't violate your inalienable rights, can't violate your fundamental right to life, liberty, and property.
所以即使多数人掌权,多数人也不能侵犯你不可剥夺的权利,不能侵犯你基本的生命,自由和财产权。
And his basic rights were seen to be absolute, for nothing must interfere with the right of each individual to defend his life, liberty, and property.
人的基本权利被视作每个个体都绝对拥有的,任何事物都无法干涉的,自卫,自由,财产的权利
Why is the fundamental right to religious liberty different from the right Alex asserts as a fundamental right to private property and to keep what I earn?
为什么宗教信仰权这一基本权利,不同于亚历克斯主张的,私有财产权,和保有自己财产的基本权利?
Libertarian say that's also a violation of the right to liberty.
自由主义者说,这也违反了个人的自由权。
Is that consistent with respect for a natural right to liberty?
这符合尊重自由权这一自然权利的精神吗?
And when Locke speaks about the right to property, he often uses that as a kind of global term for the whole category, the right to life, liberty, and property.
洛克所说的所有权,通常概括了所有的自然权利,即生命,自由和财产权。
This idea that no law can violate our right to life, liberty, and property would seem to support the idea of a government so limited that it would gladden the heart of the libertarian after all.
任何法律都不能侵犯生命自由和财产权的观点,似乎是支持“有限政府“这一观点的,这点无疑很讨自由主义者欢心。
应用推荐