"Let's get a firm strategy, let's discuss that, let's poke and prod it and ensure that we have done it the right way, then implement tactics to achieve that strategy, and part of those tactics are deciding resources."

VOA: standard.2009.10.01

So I claim that neither player has a dominated strategy, let's just check.

我说没有参与人存在劣势策略,我们来验证一下

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Let's start by plotting my expected payoff from choosing the strategy Up.

我先把选上的预期收益,标注出来

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So the strategy choices, we're not going to do it in hours, let's just normalize and regard these choices as living in 0 to 4, and you can choose any number of hours between 0 and 4.

我们用小时数来表示策略吧,用0到4的数字来标记这些策略,你可以从0到4中任选工作的小时数

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Again, so as we don't get confused, normally we use S for strategy, but let's use P since they're prices.

为了避免混淆,通常我们用S表示策略,但是这次我们使用P,因为它代表价格

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

This strategy set--formally, Let's just simplify it here-- let's assume that for each Firm i they can set their price anything bigger than 0 and anything less than 1, just to keep life simple.

至于策略集合,我们把它简化成,假设每个公司i能,将它们的价格设定为,大于0并且小于1,仅仅为了简化处理

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选