That was also true last month when the Senate Banking Committee approved its own version.
VOA: special.2010.04.16
Gadamer says, and here again he's attacking historicism: The text that is understood historically is forced to abandon its claim that it is uttering something true.
伽达默尔在攻击历史相对主义时这样说道:,文本如果放在历史的角度理解,那么这样的理解肯定不是绝对正确的。
This is true even of seemingly identical signs, because each has its use value and is only intelligible as that which it exists to mean in a certain context.
看着相同的符号也是如此,因为每一个符号都有自己的价值,只有当它出现在某一语境中才能被理解。
The classical, Gadamer argues, is that which doesn't just speak to its own historical moment but speaks for all time, speaks to all of us in different ways but does speak to us--that is to say, does proffer its claim to speak true. The classical can do that.
伽达默尔表示,古典,不是只对自己所处的历史时刻适用,而是任何时期都适用,以不同的方式对我们适用,但确实对我们适用,也就是说,确实可以提供真相,古典可以做到这一点。
应用推荐