Right? That would be an entirely different matter, wouldn't it, because you would have absolutely no idea whether the question was rhetorical or grammatical, right?

对吧，那将会是一个完全不同的情况，难道不是吗，因为你就会完全不知道,这个问句是修辞型的还是语法型的，对吧？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

So I could get to that object either through this path or through that path, it didn't matter which path I use to modify it, I would see it when I looked at the other. Yes.

另外一条绑定获得这个对象,无论我通过哪个绑定来修改它，我都能在两个绑定中都看到做的改变，是这样的。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

That's true, but that would suggest it doesn't matter if they slack off.

说得没错,但这和偷懒没什么关系啊

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

It just doesn't matter to me that it's me, anymore than it would matter to me if they just tell me, "Oh, there'll be somebody else around there " who will like Chinese poetry."

是不是我已变得不重要，不过是有人告诉我，“将来会有一个人,他喜欢中国诗词“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If so, then it would show that that extra overlap in genes doesn't really matter And so, it would suggest a low role of heredity Are adopted children highly similar to ? their brothers and sisters?

如果是这样，那就表明另外的的基因重叠,是没什么影响的,也就是说遗传的影响也很小,收养的儿童,和他们的兄弟姐妹会很相似吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选