Some neighbors say that while GW is trying to be friendlier to the environment, it could also be a better friend to the neighborhood.
VOA: special.2011.07.08
It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.
当痛苦的人,胜过当快乐的猪;,当痛苦的苏格拉底胜过当快乐的傻瓜。
And Socrates says it is better to be just even if that results in persecution and death.
苏格拉底回说,正义较好,就算结果是要面对迫害或是死亡。
"The attitude in these states is certainly different than it use to be, and not for the better,"
VOA: standard.2009.09.01
Well, if this thing is going to vibrate for any length of time it better be a standing wave.
好的,如果它在任意时间振动,那它就是驻波。
"I think on balance it will be positive in the sense that it is stimulating a recognition beyond the shores of North America, that this needs to be dealt with better."
VOA: standard.2010.04.01
Would it be better for people to be able to see everyone and maybe not feel like this is a secure environment in which they can share their interests and what they thought and what they care about?
我们可以选择,将用户信息全部公开,但在这样一个网络环境下,分享自己的所见所闻,所感所想,总会让人觉得不可靠?
Or perhaps a better word would be what is it to be reminded of something by something else that resembles it but is not the thing it reminds you of.
更恰当一点的说法是,你是如何因为另一个类似的事物,而不是这个事物本身,联想到这个事物的
It is certainly possible, for example, that a quadratic algorithm could run faster than a linear algorithm. It depends on what the input is, it depends on, you know, what the particular cases are. So it is not the case that, on every input, a linear algorithm is always going to be better than a quadratic algorithm.
一个二次平方级复杂度的算法,当然也是可能跑的比线性复杂度算法快的,这取决于,你知道的,输入以及特定的案例,因此并不是对于每个输入,线性复杂度就一定会,比二次平方级复杂度的算法的表现要好,只是通常来说是这样的。
And so similarly as Gmail's priority inbox, it's gonna be pretty flawed for a lot of us at least initially because it just doesn't know the answers a priori correctly unless we teach it or program it to be better. There is also another flaw in here or multiple flaws arguably.
类似于Gmail的优先收件箱,在起初使用时对大多数人来说它是有缺陷的,因为它不知道如何正确判断优先级,除非我们事先告诉它或编写程序改良它,另外这里存在一个或多个漏洞,可以说是缺陷。
It depends on n and k but obviously as n gets big, that one is going to be better.
但是很明显,当n取很大的值的时候,前者要比后者好。
And against that, we could have the pessimists who say, "The negative side especially once we throw in the negative interaction effects, the negative side is so great that " that it would be better never to have been born at all."
而与此相反,可能有悲观主义者说,“消极的方面,特别是我们一旦把负面相互影响考虑进去,消极的方面就会变得,让我们觉得还是压根别出生的好“
应用推荐