Doesn't that suggest that it's a mistake to try to put monetary figures on questions of human life?
这不就表明,用金钱衡量人的生命,是个错误吗?
It's a mistake I've learned that I make.
看这就是一个我学习到的错误。
And so it's a mistake, according to strong theories of rights, it's a mistake to think about justice or law by just adding up preferences and values.
这些强有力的权利理论认为,下列看法是错误的,不该只以偏好和价值的加总,来考虑公正或法律。
But that is a terrible mistake because we should know that sculptresses are very rare; very few people have the job of a sculptress or sculptor, so it's a mistake.
但这是严重错误,我们都很清楚,雕刻家是很罕见的职业,只有很少人会是雕刻家,所以这是错的
And, that's a good thing to know because if you come out with an answer that's somewhere near the diameter of the universe and it's supposed to be the diameter of an atom, then you will know that you probably made a mistake.
这是我们需要知道的,因为当你做一道题得到的答案,是宇宙的直径,而正确答案是原子直径时,你能很快发现你的错误。
It's a common mistake to make if you forget that I've actually declared that variable up top, but wait a minute, I know any time that I use a variable, I have to declare it.
这是一个通常犯的错误,如果你忘了,之前在前面已经声明了这个变量,等等,我知道在任何时候,我使用一个变量,我必须声明它。
So the flaw in the argument that Chris and Ryan had -- it isn't a bad argument, it's a good starting point but the flaw in the argument, the mistake in the argument was the first sentence in the argument.
所以克里斯和瑞恩的说法的漏洞在于,这并不是一个错误的说法,这是一个很好的出发点,但其中存在漏洞,其中的漏洞在于第一句话
I think what I want to do-- And sometimes that explanation is accurate, but the ones that are interesting here are the ones where you misattribute the cause of the arousal-- you make a mistake and think it's love when it might be due to something else.
我想做的是-,有时你的解释是正确的,但是有趣的解释是,是那些你犯了张冠李戴的错误-,你错误了认为是爱,而实际可能是其他的原因。
It's a mistake to try to consider finance in isolation.
把金融学看作一门孤立的学科是错误的
And then at the end of this passage, he says, "So it's a mistake to think that the legislative power can do what it will and dispose of the estates of the subject arbitrarily " or take any part of them at pleasure."
然后在这一节的最后,他说道,“所以,以为任何国家的立法权,能为所欲为,任意处分人民产业或掠夺任何财产,这是错误的想法“
If the insurance company has risk, it's because they've made a mistake.
如果说保险公司有风险的话,那是因为他们犯了一个错误。
You can very quickly drive yourself nuts by sitting down, thinking, oh, I can write this program, no sweat, and then you write it and then there's a tiny little mistake here, but then there's a tiny little mistake here and here, and all of these stupid little things cascade until you try running your program, and the thing just doesn't work.
如果你只是仅仅干坐着,不费吹灰之力,凭空幻想着我可以把这个项目搞定,你会想地发疯的,也许你会写出一点东西出来,可能会有一点点错误,紧接着这或那又出现一点小错误,这些小错误一点一点地堆积了起来,直到你开始运行你整个项目,你会发现这堆东西根本就不工作。
Otherwise, it's a pretty bad mistake, but sometimes you do want an infinite loop, Word for instance, Microsoft Word if you use it or pages or the like on your Mac or PC.
否则,它将会是一个错误,但有时你确实需要一个无穷循环,例如微软的,当你在Mac或者PC上使用它时。
So the best response for Player 1, as a function of what Player 2 chooses, q2, is just equal to the q1 hat in this expression and if I solve that out carefully, I will no doubt make a mistake, but let's try it.
这个就是参与人1的最佳对策,它是参与人2策略q2的一个函数,它和之前的q1帽那个表达式是相等的,虽然我是很仔细地计算的,还是有可能算错的,我来验证一下
应用推荐