I think that the distinction Iser is making between reading and interpretation can be understood in much the same way.
我想伊瑟尔想指出的,阅读与诠释之间的差异也基本上也可以这样理解。
And we bring that prejudice to bear on our interpretation of the line, then that is a constructive way into the circle according to Heidegger and Gadamer.
我们把我们的先见带入了我们对诗句的解读,按照海格德尔和伽达默尔的意思就是,良性的循环。
So, we're talking about wave functions and we know that means orbitals, but this is -- probably the better way to think about is the physical interpretation of the wave function.
我们讨论波函数而且,我们知道它代表着轨道,但-也许更好的思考方法是,考虑波函数的物理意义。
He's claiming only that it is available and can be adduced from what we call "evidence" in the same way that the symbolic interpretation, based on the rhetorical question, is available and can be adduced from evidence -and that these two viewpoints are irreducible.
他只是声称这是一种可能,而且可以从,我们所说的“证据“之中引证得到,同样的,基于修辞型问句之上的象征性诠释,也是一种可能,也能够引证,而且,这两种观点是不可削减的。
应用推荐