If you're not updating some variable by incrementing it or decrementing it -- if you're not changing anything, presumably the conditions are never going to evaluate to false or the opposite, so you're just going to have an infinite loop, which might be your goal, but odds are it's not.

如果你不通过增加或减少它来改变一些变量,-如果你不改变什么，大概那个条件永远不会变成错误的,或相反的，所以你将得到一个无限循环，那可能是你的目标，但可能也不是。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

We're checking the end test and incrementing, actually I was going to, I commented that out for a reason you'll see in a second, but I, normally I would keep this on, which would let me, at each step, see what it's doing. If I ran this, it would print out each step. Which is helping me make sure that it's incrementing the right way.

对不对？进行终结测试然后递增，实际上我要，因为某些你们,马上要明白的原因我把这里注释了，但是我通常会一直这么做，这样能让我看到每一步都做了什么，如果我运行这个程序，它会在每一步都,进行显示，这能帮助我让我确信程序是,在以正确的方式递增。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

You're incrementing this chunk of memory.

你增加了这一块内存。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Now I seem to be violating my own mantra here by just calling this variable A, but this is reasonable, I much as with four loops when you just call an incrementing variable I, because you just need an index, well, same here.

现在我好像违背了我自己的意愿,我把这个变量叫做A，但这是合理的，就像我们的for循环中，我们把一个增变量叫做,因为我们只要一个索引，这里也一样。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选