So this we would want to delete in order for the code not to run the risk of crashing, but let's now see this was made by an excellent teacher out at Stanford University.

我要按顺序删除它，不要冒崩溃的风险,但是这个是由一个来自斯坦福大学的,优秀教师做的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So if you archive it, that's maybe a little hint that either this is just your habit or perhaps that you might actually care about this later in the future, whereas if you delete it, no, you really don't care. Yeah.

如果你把邮件存档，可能暗示这可能,是你的习惯,或者以后还会用到它，相反，如果你删除了它，说明你可能根本不在意这个邮件。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So Christine is correct in saying that once we delete the strategies 1 and 10 once we realize that those positions are not going to be chosen by our sophisticated candidates then we realize that probably choosing 2 isn't a good idea either.

克里斯汀说的很对,一旦我们剔除了策略1和10,一旦我们意识到,不会有人选择这些立场时,我们会发现,选立场2或9可能也不是个好主意了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

These strategies aren't dominated, nor are they dominated once you delete the dominated strategies, nor once we dominated the strategies dominated once we've deleted the dominated strategies, but they are dominated once we delete the strategies that have been dominated in the-- you get what I'm doing here.

选择20到30的策略一开始不处于劣势,在第一次剔除劣势策略时也不处于劣势,在第二次剔除势策略之后,也不处于劣势,但是在第三次剔除劣势策略之后,就变成劣势策略了,我想你们明白我的意思了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选