"So it's certainly not going to be with us in anything less than three years, and I think it's more likely that we're in a five to ten year time frame."

VOA: standard.2010.07.21

If I talk about it in general terms, they might not put it in that frame Really, an important example of framing is how we deal with money and indexation.

但如果我用简单的话来表述它，他们可能就无法往保险那想,心理框架的另一个重要例子就是,我们是如何处理货币和指数之间的关系。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

X That's just the special symbol in C that says don't pass X, that is don't pass a copy of X. Rather figure out where x is in memory, where he is in that frame and provide swap the numeric address in RAM of that value so that swap can go do anything it wants at that address.

这在C中是一个特殊的符号，指明不传送，也不是传递X的拷贝，而是指出x在内存中哪个地方,它在那个框架中的哪个地方,提供给swap它的地址值,这样swap就可以使用那个地址中的数据。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

The percent of people who said yes to that was lower because they didn't put it in an insurance frame.

回答会签署的人占比极低,因为他们注意到框架效应的影响。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Because I thought about it a lot Welles chose that word I guess obviously that frame was a happy picture ? In the word? Why that word?

因为我对这个问题想了很多,为什么威尔斯要选择这个词,我觉得很明显，这个镜头是幸福的,词内涵的深意？还是为什么选这个词？

麻省理工公开课 - 电影哲学课程节选

So, just, if you can take what I'm saying for a moment right now that in fact this should collapse in this very small time frame, we have to see that there's a problem with one of these two things, either the Coulomb force law or Newtonian mechanics. So, what do you guys think is probably the issue here?

所以如果你们考虑我,开始说的这个塌缩应该,发生在很短的时间里，那么这两者之一就有问题,要么是库伦定律,要么是牛顿力学,你们觉得应该是哪个的问题？

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

.. So, we have to frame things as-- put things in the mental categories-- presentation matters-- so that people can manage their risks right.

因此由于框架效应-,我们会把事物按照心理类别分类-,所以得注意使用正确的表述方式-,以便去恰当的进行风险管理。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

That would be putting it in a real frame and-- wouldn't that be more sensible, because you would be specifying the contract in real terms rather than money terms?

那样的话就是一种实物框架理念-,那样不是更合理吗，因为在你拟定合约时,会更倾向于用实物而非货币来计算？

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选