If you start segregating the gases, there are fewer possible configurations that because you're forcing a particular set of circumstances.
如果你开始分离这些气体,整个系统所具有的可能的状态就会变少,你强加了一个特定的条件。
So if you wanna do something conditionally, you generally needs to ask the question, is the following true or false.
假如想在一定条件下做一件事情,你需要判断下这个条件,来看看条件是真还是假。
Whereas under these conditions, these quantities, if you look at free energy change, for example at constant temperature and pressure, H you can still calculate H.
但是,在这些条件下,这些物理量,如果我们考察自由能的变化,例如在恒定的温度和压强下,我们仍然可以计算。
You put some inputs in, it has a contract that says if you put the right kind of inputs in you'll get a specific output coming out, but you don't have to know what's inside of that box.
你可以将输入一些内容,它相当于一个条件合约,如果你的输入是正确的,你就能得到特定的输出,但是你不知道盒子里面有些什么。
And, if the conditions are right, they will combine, fuse and form darmstadtium plus neutron.
如果条件是正确的,它们将会结合,融合并形成鐽中子。
And then, you start thinking, "Well, I could really start doing this if only X and if I had this person or if this technology existed or if this happened or this happened."
之后,你会开始思考,恩,只要某项条件成熟了,只要我认识这个人,或是如果这个技术存在,或是如果这个或那个发生了,我就能开始落实这个点子了“
Well, I think actually, you probably could tell a story where that was true, especially if we throw in enough doses of memory loss.
我想,实际上,这也许行得通,尤其是在引入失记的条件下。
So if we differentiate this object, I'm gonna find a first order condition in a second.
想要求它的导数,先让我想想一阶条件
And, in fact, once you teach an animal something, if you stop doing the teaching the response goes away and this is known as extinction.
事实上,条件反射形成以后,如果得不到强化,条件反应就会逐渐消失,这就是消退。
The question is, "If you're naturally exposed to antigen wouldn't this happen anyway?"
她的问题是,在自然条件下,如果接触某种抗原,那么就是否就不发生二次免疫
It's a very general condition--"If you obey my laws."
非常笼统的条件-“如果你们遵守我的规定“
.. Because you wouldn't have... You wouldn't be able to make money, you wouldn't be able to own property if there wasn't that socially, like, if society wasn't stable, and that's completely different from religion.
因为你不可能。,如果没有社会条件,如果社会不稳定,你就赚不到钱,更别提拥有财产了,这跟宗教完全是两码事。
In fact, I would encourage you to think the way physicists do, even if you don't plan to be a physicist, because that's the easiest way to do this subject, and that is to follow the reasoning behind everything I give you.
其实,即使你们不打算以后当物理学家,我也希望你们能像物理学家一样思考,因为这是学习这门课的捷径,也就是利用我给你的条件一步一步地推导
If you think about what ancient food gathering habits used to be like, you see things like this where people are out gathering food that is growing naturally, and you can think about what would-- what sort of conditions this would create and what kind of hardships it would create.
如果你想知道古代食物采集的习惯,请看这张图,人类都在野外采集自然生长的食物,你可以设想到,条件有多恶劣,生存有多艰难
It's 71 or whatever so that if condition doesn't apply, but now what do I do in this next line?
它似乎71或者其它的,如果条件不适用,在下一行我做了什么?
In those cases, though, you'd have quite a reasonable equilibrium, spontaneously that is there would be a lot of reaction that went if you simply started under practical conditions and let it go.
你也会得到平衡,尽管在这种情况下你得到了一个,自发的,合理的平衡,这是在正常条件下进行的,许多化学反应的情况。
Do I have two yes answers if you wanna check two conditions at once? You know, this might seem to be a bit of a new context for some of you but consider a typical website.
我能不能对两个条件同时判断,来看看它们是不是都为真?,这些概念可能对你们中一些人有点新颖,那么就考虑一个典型网站。
That was the kind of thing you saw. Asserts said here are some conditions to test. If they're true, I'm going to let the rest of the code run.
这就是你看到的,断言是一些测试条件,如果他们为真。
How many moles of gas are there in each case, in reactants and products? If that changes, of course you know that the pressure in there is going to change at constant volume if the amount of gas in there is changing.
在反应物和生成物中,各有多少摩尔的气体?,如果它发生了变化,当然在等体条件下,如果气体的总量,发生了变化,压强也会发生变化。
That's only going to be true if dying as a joint undertaking is impossible.
这只能在共同死亡是不可能的条件下才是真的。
So you start with your basic model, then you add in, you enrich the model, and you see if the results change, and that'll help you explain why you're getting different results in different settings.
你们从最原始的模型开始,加入约束条件来丰富这个模型,然后检验结果是否有变,这能帮助我们解释,为什么在不同条件下结果是不同的
You can say if this is true, then go and do the following pieces of code or puzzle pieces that are inside this part of the block, else go ahead and do these that are down here.
你可以说如果条件成立,执行下面的代码段,或板块中的拼图,否则跳过去执行这下面的语句。
If something is true do this, else something is true, do that.
如果某些条件是真的,就做这件事,否则另外一些条件为真的话就做另外一件事。
We know that if these players play these games, at least if we believe in Nash Equilibrium, then they're gonna produce these quantities, they're going to produce here.
我们知道如果这些参与人进行博弈,至少我觉得在纳什均衡条件下,他们会安排这样的产量
Is to say, okay now let's try to enrich the model, to add more into the model, and see if you get a different result, and if so why?
好吧,那我们就来完善这个模型吧,给这个模型加入新的约束条件,看看会不会得到不同的结果,如果是再分析原因
Computing square root. I'm going to capture it in a piece of code, I'm going to be able to refer to it by a name, and I'm going to suppress the details, meaning inside of that computation, you don't need to know what it does. You just need to know, if I give it the right kind of input, it'll give me back an input that satisfies the contract that I set up.
比如计算平方根,我会用一段代码来说明,我将给它命名,并且忽略细节,意思就是在这一段计算过程中,你不用知道它做了什么,你只需知道,如果我进行了正确的输入,它将会给我符合条件的输出。
If these are the conditions for contact, to what extent are they met in the university setting between, say blacks and whites, people from the American South versus people from the American North, people from other countries versus people from the United States?
如果大学环境里有这些接触的条件,有多少是属于促成因素的?,例如在黑人和白人之间,来自美国南方的人,和来自美国北方的人之间,外国的学生,和美国的学生之间?
And then this second term, if we go to the Periodic Table, 2 we will find that the value here for hydrogen is 2.2 98 and the value for fluorine is 3.98.
再算上第二个条件,翻看元素周期表,我们查处H,F电负性分别为2,2。2,3。
You've got a loop, you've got a condition and a boolean to check if he's touching the edge, and some statements to tell him to shout or to actually turn around.
我们有一个循环,通过一个条件和一个布尔值来判断,是否触到了边缘,还有一些语句,让它回头并咆哮。
应用推荐