• So even though there's only two firms here, with price competition, identical products, we end up with an outcome that looks exactly like perfect competition, except for the fact there's only two firms.

    尽管这里只有两家公司,进行某种产品的价格竞争,我们得到了,和完全竞争非常相似的结果,除了只有两家公司这个事实

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So the products we mentioned last time were Coke and Pepsi, but you could think of other products that are pretty much identical.

    上次举例的产品是可口可乐和百事可乐,但你们可以把它想象成其他,同样的产品

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The assumption we're going to change is the idea that products are identical.

    我们要改变的是,产品是一样的,这个假设

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The point I'm trying to make is, products are not identical.

    我尝试表达的观点是,产品不是一模一样的

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • I'm going to claim that assuming that products are not identical, is a pretty safe assumption for most of the world, for most things that you're going to see in the world.

    我认为假设产品不同,对大多数人来说很容易被接受,对多数情况来说

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定